63
submitted 12 hours ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

I don’t know anything about situation but damn they really found the umm most flamboyants pictures of him.

[-] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The question is whether this is all there is.

He originally applied for a student visa. If a judge takes this at face value and is approved, every asylum seeker will take a picture with rainbows to get approved. The judge did comment on posturing and I think is just asking "have you ever been in a same sex relationship?". It could be that there is zero evidence of a relationship.

Being gay isn't wearing rainbows, it's being attracted to someone of the same sex.

Asylum cases are a little more challenging and do need more proof than other situations.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

If you come from a country where homosexuals have to fear for their life, taking and publishing pictures like that puts you in mortal danger if your asylum claim is denied.
I'd say after providing these photos, it almost doesn't matter whether you're really gay.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 4 points 5 hours ago

That's what I was thinking. If it's dangerous to send back someone who is gay, then it is dangerous to send back someone who is very publicly perceived to be gay. In some ways, the publicity from this case has made his case stronger.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
63 points (94.4% liked)

UK Politics

3051 readers
219 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS