28

I see there’s 5k cameras, but it feels superfluous since mostly everything is 4K. Plus, unsure what device would be suggested for an amateur taking pictures and sometimes video of my nephews baseball games. He’s pitching if that has anything to do with the megapixels for videos and hoping to keep the price around $100-$150?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 6 points 2 weeks ago

Had a feeling, but my sister seemed sure I was giving up to easily.

How much would you say a camera for this purpose would run?

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago
[-] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 7 points 2 weeks ago

A pretty good chunk of change, I had a feeling, thanks.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

What are your minimum requirements? I would heartily recommend doing just a smidge of research. This site has been my one and only go to for, I dunno, like 15-20 years or something. https://www.dpreview.com/articles/1328199596/buying-guide-what-to-know-before-buying-your-first-interchangeable-lens-digital-camera

That's just for the right lens, too.

[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 5 points 2 weeks ago

Sports photography is not a cheap hobby. Expect to spend 10 times your budget just to get started. You can save (some) money by shopping used on sites like adorama or B&H. Older models of DSLR can be had for a pretty good deal because all the kids these days are hyped about mirrorless. Expect to do a lot of research and wade through a lot of articles written by gear obsessed people with money to burn. I think you can still browse archives of dpreview.com for some in depth reviews and specs, especially if you're shopping older models.

Pretty much any consumer camera with an interchangeable lens will do the job, it's the lens that will really determine how good a picture you can get. There's a reason you see a lot of HUGE (and expense) lens on the sidelines. Megapixels are much less important these days because pretty much everything has enough. The metrics you'll be looking to maximize will be a fast autofocus system, a fast lens, and a long enough focal length to get your view in close to your subject from a distance. You might be able to find something that is "good enough" in a cheaper range with a camera with a built-in lens. If you get bit by the photography bug though, that might turn out to be a waste of money if you decide you want to upgrade.

[-] iamericandre@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Probably at least in the 1k range

[-] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 7 points 2 weeks ago

Had a feeling this would be the answer, thanks.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
28 points (96.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43791 readers
849 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS