view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
So of the 130k they stole they only have to give up 25k of it? And they say crime doesn’t pay.
Depending on the charity but legally you only have to give 10% in some states even less to the cause you are collecting for. Rest can go to "administration " fees.
If I had no morals or ethics I could get rich running a charity. . Knew a guy made bank running those donate your car, boat etc to battery women charitys. Gave 10% rest was cost of advertising and his salary.
He even lived in a house that had been donated.
Most charity's are big scams.
Oh god I knew it was bad but 10% or less !? OMG
Yep I heard it can get as low as 2% but been years since I looked into starting one could be different. Believe Oklahoma is 5%.
How work is you register your charity with the state once approved (can take up to 2 years) you setup a board and decide all your salary and administration cost ie: advertising, employees, office expenses etc. Then you start collecting. Minus all your cost rest you give to the actual charity. But legally only have to give a certain percentage. Rest you can keep. How come the breast cancer awareness raises millions but see how much Susan B Coleman actually give to research in breast cancer. Won't be much.
So it seems a total of $75k from 3 different people. Not the full amount, but also not only $25k.
You mean 50k from 2 people? They still profites.
The two I referenced and this one. Sure it's not the total amount, but more than just $25k from one.
The two allege that they returned the rest of the money when they found out there wasn't a deal to donate the money to the food bank/organization. And that it was a 3rd individual who actually scammed them into participating.
Hopefully they proved that to the court before being let off with this wrist slap, but it's a Republican AG and Republican judge, so who knows.
I'm with you. I wanted to preface with "not that I believe it but..."