44
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)
Ontario
2187 readers
85 users here now
A place to discuss all the news and events taking place in the province of Ontario, Canada.
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
From the article it doesn't seem like anything fraudulent happened here. So many corporations used the government handouts in ways that actually were fraud and weren't punished like this. In Sudbury, our Chief Medical Officer billed a million dollars of overtime over the two pandemic years, and that was somehow okay.
Unless I'm missing something the outrage seems justified. Doug really is "siding with the doctors and nurses" eh
Those vaccines were not administered by her or her staff, but by local medical students, and not in her office, both of which apparently go against billing codes.
I'm not sure I agree with seizure of all funds here, and the vaccine clinics did good, but I think the doctor intended to misuse billing codes and I understand why the Ministry wants some money back. There should have been more communication and compromise earlier on. Like, if a doctor bills the province for $100,000 for a day's services that should raise a flag
I mean this part sounds sketchy to me. Are you allowed to pay volunteers?
I feel like asking her to account for the cost is not ridiculous. She deserves to be paid for the work she says went into it, including training and organizing, but is that $600,000 worth?
That being said them reaching for this bulletin they provided seems like a stretch. Like the article says, if they had specifically asked for the bulletin to be waived during COVID, I'm sure the govt would have waived it, so that part feels like a big reach.
Billing codes are purposely complicated to deny legitimate claims a lot of the time. Two nearly identical codes will have one covered and another not for whatever reason they come up with. It's why there are entire teams to handle billing at large institutions.
The real question honestly, is if those individuals were authorized to give shots, are there different billing codes that should have been used instead? And if not, why?
This happened in Canada, not the US, but I agree with the US healthcare issues you mentioned
Canada is the same, just single payer (ie instead of hospitals billing the insurance company, they bill OHIP). There's still complicated codes, though for what it's worth they don't change much, if at all. If you're billing thousands of shots you'd probably want to double check you're using the right codes.
The Canadian Healthcare system isn't that different from the US as much as you all might want to think it is. You just have fewer groups paying, the bullshit complexity built into the system is a near copy of the US.