66
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
66 points (93.4% liked)
World News
32317 readers
499 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hankyoreh
This newspaper has a hard on for downplaying north Korean aggression. They want to all be friends.
I read OPs article twice, and i can't find any mention of any south Korean intelligence agents specifically. Are these anonymous sources? Is the whole thing made up? Where's the direct quotes? There's a whole lot of hand waving and nothing really of substance in this article.
The authors position really starts to be apparent when you start looking at the rest of their reporting on the same website. You can also see how the author IS fully capable of providing quotes and sources, just I guess not on this latest article.
https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/1163962.html
https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/1162683.html
There's just a few examples. This author makes every possible attempt to downplay North Korean aggression, blaming it on SK or the US every time.
Such a fucking chickenhawk you are. "Aw, these authors want to BUST MASSIVE LOADS all over KOREAN STRONGMEN. They want to be TOPPED by KIM JONG UN!" literally just because they want the peaceful reunification of their nation instead of a war for the US to have effective control of a land border with China.
From what you share I see quoting activists and trying to defuse stories that seem very improbable because there is a long history of SK and US media just making shit up about NK and it being gobbled up uncritically. But please, tell me about unicorns and state-mandated haircuts, it'll be a good use of both our time. The kids eat the rats and the rats eat the kids.
Edit: Oh, but to answer the main question I missed:
Because it's talking about intelligence officials talking directly to reporters, my feeling is that it's an anonymous source, though it should definitely have made this clear.
For a liberal outlet, it's pretty decent yeah. Doesn't fall for US propaganda about the DPRK too much.