1034
Corruption (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 108 points 1 month ago

If you live in Europe and think your democratic system is resistant to these things: it's not.

Don't wait until your version of Trump gets elected. Start organizing now.

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 18 points 1 month ago

Italy elected Berlusconi (a corrupted tycoon who had ties with the mafia and bribed his way to the top of the Italian broadcasting world) in 1994. Y'all just catching up.

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 10 points 1 month ago

Don't wait until your version of Trump gets elected. Start organizing now.

No worries, he already has been elected last year!

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 month ago

Dick Schoof (yes, English speakers, that really is his legal name) is our Trump?

I'd say Geert Wilders matches that description, and he did not become PM...

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

Dick Schoof didn't get elected though, at least not by the people... Wilders was

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 month ago

Correction: Wilders received the most votes from the people, but could not become PM as his party needed to form coalitions to gain enough seats. Essentially, he did not get elected PM because most others did not want to work together with him.

Was our parliament filled with lunatics vehemently agreeing with him, we'd have Wilders as PM.

[-] oktoberpaard@feddit.nl 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Absolutely, over here we’ve recently elected a horrible party as the biggest one, with 25% of the votes. Dark times.

The difference is that in many European countries the head of state is more of a ceremonial position (at least in practice) and the head of the government holds nowhere near the amount of power a US president does. With proportional representation, the biggest party often doesn’t have an absolute majority and needs to form a government together with other parties, or might even end up in the opposition. Together they agree on who’s going to be the head of government (usually the head of the largest party), who will be the ministers and what will be the policy. If it doesn’t work out because of disagreements, the government breaks up and new elections will be held.

My point is: the risk is real, populism is growing, policy is shifting, but the dynamics are different. Having a first past the post system and concentrating so much power into a single political position feels like an accelerator.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
1034 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

5391 readers
503 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS