98
submitted 5 hours ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 4 hours ago

Yes, but it is also a bit scary / dystopian that a $62 billion company would go to such great lengths to have one of their own customers thrown in jail for using the product that he paid for in a way that wasn't hurting anyone.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 hour ago

Welcome to the mundane, realistic cyberpunk dystopia, hope you paid attention to more than the flashy surface level marketing.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 27 points 4 hours ago

He didn't just use the product he paid for in a way that doesn't hurt anybody, he sold pirated Nintendo Switch games. This is literally at the start of the article.

It then becomes very easy to say he took revenue from Nintendo (the "they wouldn't have bought it if it cost money" argument doesn't apply), but above all selling pirated material is a shitty thing to do.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 hours ago

Yep. He sold ROMs. I have no sympathy for privateers in "the scene."

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago

Definitely. It's not even about defending Nintendo.

I hate people who try to profit off of privacy when piracy is available for free.

It reminds me of my university days when people would be selling PDFs of course textbooks...just email a copy of the file!

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 0 points 2 hours ago

I don't think he quite did that, actually. From memory he ran a few "shops", but these didn't really sell anything and were just download portals to install pirated games directly from the internet (rather than downloading to a PC first and then copying to an SD card or installing over USB). However, I think he did take donations for early access to new titles, which would have been hard to get elsewhere at first.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

However, I think he did take donations for early access to new titles,

When video game companies accept money for early access to their games, that's a sale. You give them money, they give you access. I'm not sure why that wouldn't also apply here.

From your description, unless you were allowed to donate $0 for access, that sounds a lot like a sale to me.

[-] Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 hours ago

Hardly dystopian. They just had someone who understands how tech works on staff.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
98 points (99.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54609 readers
365 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS