150

Crossposting here as I consider X a threat to both privacy and freedom

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] INeedMana@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

I don't know

Wouldn't that enable an angle of "martyr for freedom of speech"?

And while I agree that it stopped being what it was and we can't rely on it anymore, wouldn't that separate EU from the rest of the world given current market share?

In my opinion: abandon - yes. Ban - no

[-] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

In my opinion: abandon - yes. Ban - no

Perhaps it is time to bring this old post of mine back from the dead? I argue that we have to start a war of attrition on mainstream platforms.

[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

Abandon would be the best approach. A ban would just make people want to use it more.

When twitter (now formally know as "X") was first a thing, the only reason I joined was because private business, city services, and news agencies became a little easier to follow in one unified location. It also made it easier to reach them with quick tweets.

Maybe the solution is to put a restriction on business, news agencies, and government services from using it?

[-] sibachian@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

how dare you suggest a cure instead of a bandaid?!

[-] sleen@lemmy.zip 7 points 23 hours ago

Initially thought the post was an attempt on a joke. But yes, what would banning prove?

X might be a threat to privacy and freedom but doesn't Facebook, Microsoft and others do the same. It looks like a poorly developed plan.

[-] sibachian@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 hours ago

in my opinion facebook and microsoft are worse because you can't optionally avoid them. no matter what you do, you're still paying for microsoft products through your taxes with money that should go into domestic development. facebook is so insideous that in some countries it is the de-facto internet (because it's free to use without a paid internet plan/subscription); all hobby communities that i'm aware of now exclusively live on facebook, and forget your grandma having any other means of contact than through facebook messenger and certain companies and services offer facebook messenger only live support. and as a business owner? you don't have a choice on the matter, facebook (and google) is the only means to advertise nowadays that have actual measurable results on the campaign budget.

twitter? unless you're a creative or a connoisseur of creatives, it actually has a lot less relevance than the current drama suggests, otherwise the big alternative platforms wouldn't have actual relevance and upwards mobility, which they currently do.

[-] donuts@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Wouldn't that enable an angle of "martyr for freedom of speech"?

Could you elaborate on this angle? I'm not very well versed in the rights of companies operating in the EU, but I'm unsure "freedom of speech" is one of them.

Edit: I did find information about how social media needs to help us protect freedom of speech for all of their users. Currently, X is doing the opposite it seems

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
150 points (86.8% liked)

Privacy

32008 readers
1001 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS