97
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] superkret@feddit.org 46 points 6 days ago

If the servers can only handle a certain number of players, then they should only sell a certain number of licenses for the game.
Then, when concurrent player numbers drop over time, they can release more.

But no, they'll happily take the money from everyone on launch even though their servers can't handle the load.

[-] DrCake@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

Could you imagine the possibly equally as bad reception if a digital game was limited? Then add in that you’d get scalpers trying to sell steam keys for stupid money.

This is just another example of why you should wait a while before buying a new game, even sequels.

[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

I vividly remember a downloaded game telling me they had run out of available licences, once. Can't remember exactly, but I'm pretty certain it was on Steam. How you run out of numbers still rascals me, all these years later. And I say this as a software dev.

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 7 points 6 days ago

Want to sell: Microsoft flight simulator license DM me to discuss price.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works -2 points 6 days ago

Maybe there's a middle ground, where instead of just letting a flood of people all download your game on day one, the publisher like pre-downloads it onto some sort of physical media, and then sell copies of that physical media. That way people could get into the game immediately when they receive their copy without having to wait on the same 6 hour download that a million other people are also waiting on, that download activity doesn't interfere with the bandwidth of people trying to play the game, and the physical availability puts a sort of temporary artificial limit on how many people can play at once.

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

People can already get into the game immediately when they receive their copy, just with a vastly simplified distribution mechanism called "download". You might not remember all the issues physical distribution mechanisms had back in the day.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

They probably didn't know how many players their servers could support. This was one way to find out.

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago

Any company worth any money does stress tests of their servers to simulate different scenarios with different loads.

Either they were overconfident, or simply didn’t think QA testing was necessary or worth the cost.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
97 points (99.0% liked)

Games

16828 readers
851 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS