740
submitted 2 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

President Joe Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden, reversing his prior stance against using executive clemency.

The pardon covers Hunter’s federal gun conviction and tax evasion guilty plea, sparking political controversy.

Biden cited political attacks and a “miscarriage of justice” as reasons for his decision, emphasizing his son’s recovery from addiction and the targeting of his family.

Critics argue the move undermines the judicial process, while supporters view it as within Biden’s constitutional powers.

This decision shields Hunter from potential prison time as Biden nears the end of his presidency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 96 points 2 weeks ago

A lot of people here missing the point. We don't care about this because Hunter was the target of a witch hunt. The actual "crimes" weren't impactful at all. The Republicans literally spent 8 years dragging him through the mud, digging for anything that he could be charged with, just because who his dad is. And Hunter didn't even touch politics in the slightest.

The gun charge is the moral equivalent of crucifying someone for having pirated music on their hard drive. It was a nothing crime, never enforced, and the only reason it was in this case was because they happened to find something they could latch onto.

I don't know anything about the tax evasion conviction. If it was serious, then sure, fuck him. But I'd want them going after every politician AND their family with equal vigor. But guess what? They aren't.

That's why most of us don't really care. The man is not important. He holds no position of power, nor has he expressed any intent to. He is not important, except as a whipping boy for their propaganda. And a pardon for such preposterous prosecution is fine with me.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We don’t care about this because Hunter was the target of a witch hunt.

He was convicted in court by a jury of his peers same as every other American under charges would see. He wasnt convicted in some political "witch hunt" process in congress, nor was he convicted by an activist judge. The congressional investigation went nowhere and was shut down. Hunters convictions carried a sentence of 15 to 21 months. If his conviction is unfair and needs to be resisted then the entire system of justice in america is unfair.

The actual “crimes” weren’t impactful at all.

thats not your call to make. This is just another case of hard justice being for the little people only, and you seem to be cheering that on. How low can you go, man. Biden spent a lifetime banging tables pretending to be a tough on crime guy. You seem to have forgotten all of that.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This never should have been before a jury.

The prosecution had agreed to drop the gun charge as apart of a plea bargain (because it's a crime that is only ever used as an add-on for violent crimes). But the fucking judge rejected the plea deal after Biden had admitted guilt.

That's bullshit and 100% should have been thrown out.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not a lawyer, but I thought the way it worked was that the prosecutor offers the plea bargain and the accused accepts but it's still up to the judge's discretion whether that accepted plea bargain goes through, meaning that the system was working as it always works and it wasn't some sort of special persecution deal.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The judge almost never throws out a plea bargain - and it's almost unheard of for one to throw it out for not being harsh enough.

They're more often rejected for thing like a plea bargain where the case should be dismissed entirely or the defendant has a very good chance of winning or securing a lesser conviction at trial. Judges are supposed to err on the side of leniency.

Rejecting a plea bargain because a charge that is almost never prosecuted is being dismissed is judicial malpractice.

The gun crime he was convicted for is one that anyone who has ever smoked pot is guilty of if they ever touched a gun before quitting pot entirely.

If a resident of Colorado eats a gummy legally and has a gun in the safe at home, they've committed the same crime.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago

If Conservatives cared about this law, all they would have to do is pull dispensary ID logs and probably a tenth or more of all gun applicants could be arrested. But they don't do that because people don't care, and they just want another law they can apply selectively.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

He was convicted in court by a jury of his peers same as every other American under charges would see.

So was Trump. But he got away with it and is now President. Hell, he didn't even have to go through the process for most of his crimes. Just bypassed it all.

Nothing else matters now. The rest of your comment is irrelevant. The justice system is irrelevant.

Free Hunter!!!

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

First, did Bidden just notice that his son was a target of a "witch hunt" after the election? Or was he just lying before?

And second, Bidden literally controlled the DOJ for 4 years. It was his call whether to go after other corrupt politicians or not.

[-] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 37 points 2 weeks ago

I think Biden was holding out hope in the institutions and people of America and was sorely disappointed, like a lot of us, so is doing what he has to, like a lot of us.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Bingo.

Biden was waiting to see if America's institutions and citizens would hold up and pass the test. They did not. They failed spectacularly, in fact. A criminal became president and will now not be held accountable for his crimes, and citizens voted explicitly for that corruption.

I'd be damned if I was sitting president if I would let my son be in prison for non-violent crimes when a criminal who openly stated he would target his political opponents sits in the Oval Office.

Clearly taking the high road doesn't work in America, so why the fuck should Biden continue doing so?

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago

It is amazing to me how people will make excuses for a lying politician that even he did not bother to make.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

What's amazing to me is that you people fall for the rage bait every time.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Crocodile tears for this rich shitty little partier silver spooned brat, but anyone else convicted by a jury of their peers should go to jail where they belong, huh.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

It’s common practice for outgoing presidents to wrap up loose ends like this. Late term pardons are not a new thing.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, but he's a Democrat, so he's held to higher standards than Republicans.

If a Republican did this you probably wouldn't have even heard about it.

Do we need any better example than what just happened to know that Democrats are held to astronomically high standards, while Republicans can basically do whatever the fuck they want without repercussion?

She had to be flawless and he got to be lawless.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

He did not just leave it for later, he actively lied saying he will not pardon Hunter.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

And?

You gonna leave your son in prison while a criminal president who explicitly stated he'd target his political opponents sits in the Oval Office?

Republicans just blatantly lied their way into total power and you're over here whining about a Democrat lying about getting his son out of prison for non-violent crimes on his way out of office?

Your priorities are utterly fucked.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I can simultaneously "whine" about multiple things. I guess I am talented at "whining".

Also, this kind of shit is part of the reason why that orange won in the first place. Democrats putting up a marginally better candidate and pretending to be saviors of the Earth.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

The calories you burned typing your complaint about Biden pardoning Hunter are wasted calories. It's so irrelevant and small compared to the avalanche of bullshit we've already dealt with and will be dealing with for the foreseeable future, that it's comical to even consider. The fact that Trump made it abundantly clear he'd be targeting his political opponents is all the justification needed for Biden to pardon Hunter.

And no, Democrats putting up a "marginally" better candidate is not how the orange dipshit won. First of all, a successful prosecutor with a doctorate in law and a significant political resume isn't "marginally" better than a twice impeached convicted felon and rapist who instigated a violent insurrection and illegally attempted to overturn an election. I don't know what dimension someone has to live in to think there's only a "marginal" difference there. Secondly, the orange dipshit is president because Americans are STUPID. Because Americans don't do their homework. Americans don't lookup voting histories so they can see that Democrats are way better about voting in favor of the working class. They don't look up the conviction histories to find out Democrats have WAY, WAY less convicted criminals who have served in their ranks than Republicans. Americans don't grasp that you aren't just voting for the person, but the party. Donald Trump is president....again....because Americans are STUPID. Not because Democrats are only "marginally" better.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The calories you burned

Meh, I can use fewer calories.

Americans are STUPID

Can't argue there.

Americans don't grasp that you aren't just voting for the person, but the party.

You literally vote for specific people in the US, unlike in many countries where you vote for parties. That's the whole point of your incredibly flawed representatives system. Saying people should vote Harris because of her party is like saying people should buy the terrible and useless apple vision because other apple products are good.

a successful prosecutor with a significant political resume

To most people, those sound like red flags, not advantages.

convicted felon and rapist who instigated a violent insurrection and illegally attempted to overturn an election

I mean, yeah. Americans are stupid. But then again, why should anyone believe those accusations if democrats argue lying is perfectly fine and not an issue?

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

You literally vote for specific people in the US, unlike in many countries where you vote for parties. That’s the whole point of your incredibly flawed representatives system. Saying people should vote Harris because of her party is like saying people should buy the terrible and useless apple vision because other apple products are good.

If you don't think a party gains power by their represenative becoming president, I'm not really sure how to proceed with explaining it to you.

To most people, those sound like red flags, not advantages.

Refer to my comment about Americans being STUPID. Then check her resume. She spent A LOT of time going after assholes that made people's lives harder.

why should anyone believe those accusations

Because they aren't accusations. They are facts. And facts matter. Not to stupid Americans, but to some people out there in the world.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Because they aren't accusations. They are facts.

Unfortunately, most people are neither omniscient, nor willing to spend large (or any) amounts of time to figure out what are the facts in a sea of lies from both sides.

"Hey, I can vote for one of two liars, both supporting genocide. Well, I guess I will vote for the one whose party doesn't insist I should be ashamed for being born white and/or male." - What I imagine lost democrats the election.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, true, but does it matter? The new president spits out dozens of lies daily and he got voted in. If anything, this is what the people want, someone who lies to them.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago

If it doesn't matter, why is everyone angry at the people who didn't vote? :D

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Because they enabled this system where nothing matters?

[-] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

This, I think, is what bothers me. I understand the reasoning but still.... The pardoning, no surprise. The lying, makes me a bit sad. I understand the reasoning but it still makes me sad.

[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Guess he changed his mind.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Im uninformed so I know nothing of Hunter's supposed crimes. Can I get a quick rundown?

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

If you're being serious, the gun charge is that he checked some box on a gun application stating that he didn't have any drug addiction problems. IIRC, it was after he got his shit together and was sober.

I didn't follow the tax evasion charge.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

I honestly have no in depth knowledge of any of this stuff

[-] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know anything about the tax evasion conviction. If it was serious, then sure, fuck him.

If you can't even be bothered to read an article about it why should any weight be given to your opinion. The tax fraud was 1.4 million dollars and he actively lied on his returns to avoid payment. He effectively stole over a million dollars, fuck him and all tax cheats.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ok. What part of that conflicts with what I said?

If he cheated on taxes, then fuck him. But I think it's generally assumed that these fucks all cheat on their taxes. So if you're going to go after one, then go after all of them.

And again, he's not actually a politician, and was only targeted because of who his dad is. If you don't see that as abuse of authority as revenge against his dad, then there's no point in talking to you.

Also, if you read the fucking article yourself, it never goes into details on the tax charges.

[-] One_Honest_Dude@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

There is no "if," he did cheat on his taxes for over a million dollars. Yes, go after all of them! The only reason Hunter got away for so long was because of who his dad is, so kind of karmic that it came back around for the same reason. Hunter received far more leniency for a long time for drugs, gun, and financial crimes due to his wealth and families influence and Joe Biden was instrumental in making sure poor people who do the same thing get punished harshly. Until it was HIS son, then all the excuses came out.

Also, if you read the fucking article yourself, it never goes into details on the tax charges.

This article does not, but none of this is new. We have known about these crimes for years. You displayed absolutely zero curiosity about what crimes he did in your haste to whitewash Biden's hypocrisy. We will not get better politicians or leaders until we demand it.

I do not care that Hunter was not a politician, though that never prevented him from getting paid off his family name and only avoided punishment for so long because of who his father is. I do not care why the charges come about, these rich fucks need to pay. Maybe if the Democrats were willing to see that the rich and powerful actually face consequences Trump and all these right wing grifters might have been dealt with before they came to power. But back when Trump and Kushner were donating to Democratic campaigns none of them managed to give a shit. We should strive for a higher standard of morality than Donald fucking Trump.

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
740 points (97.9% liked)

News

23600 readers
3467 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS