696
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

So they are using it to try and decide on deployment?

If that is all they're using it for I guess it isn't too bad. As long as it isn't accusing individuals of planning to commit a crime with a zero evidence.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It is probably going to be used to justify the disproportionate police attention paid to minority communities and to justify activities similar to stop and frisk.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

The thing is don't they already have crime stats? Presumably they're already using them as justification so this won't change much.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

No, it's bad, because ultimately it's not leading anywhere, such tools can't be used by unqualified people not understanding how they work (not many qualified people do too, my teamlead at work, for example, is enthusiastic and just doesn't seem to hear arguments against, at least those I can make with my ADHD, that is, avoiding detailed explanations to the bone).

If ultimately it's not applicable where people want to apply it, it shouldn't even be tested.

This is giving such applications credibility.

It's the slippery slope that some people think doesn't exist. Actually they exist everywhere.

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
696 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

6016 readers
1985 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS