131
Man accused of hate crime in killing of gay man claims self-defense
(abcnews.go.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
131 points (98.5% liked)
News
23622 readers
3321 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It has to do with a bigoted Florida judge (a common thing) deciding that killing a queer person is justified and finding the 'stand your ground' argument acceptable because of it. I'm not sure why this has to be spelled out for you.
Ok. I'll bite. What evidence can you provide that it's common for Florida judges to be bigoted?
Are you fucking serious? What country do you think Florida is in?
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/trump-stacked-courts-judges-hostile-toward-gays-rights-group-says-n1252899
Judges in Florida literally allowed themselves to not give a shit about fairness or diversity by not teaching about it.
https://floridaphoenix.com/2023/02/03/justices-strip-fairness-and-diversity-from-floridas-judicial-education-programs/
Your first link doesn't even mention Florida (unless I missed it). It simply states other judges that have been appointed by Trump. You created the scope of the conversation by stating it is common for Florida judges to be "bigoted". I'm seeking examples of said bigotry.
Your second link simply states Florida judges, who are required to take 30 hours of classes, are no longer required to take any classes regarding "fairness and diversity". That is certainly not evidence of bogtry.
Look man, you are the one you made a statement: Florida judges are commonly bigoted. Your links don't prove anything of the sort. I'm talking about them handing down verdicts that are objectively bigoted towards the person who is on the receiving end of that verdict. And I'm not taking about one or two cases. You said "common" which means this happens on a routine basis. Either you have the evidence or you don't.
Okay, you go ahead and believe Southern judges aren't bigoted. Enjoy your privilege.
Be an adult and admit you can't prove your case. This platform is severely lacking in mental maturity. You would be doing me a genuine favor. I'm not kidding.
At the very least, I encourage you to not make claims you can't back up. I'm not being a jerk. I'm trying to help you.
Insulting me doesn't make the South a less extremely racist place.
Again, enjoy your privilege.
I never insulted you. Though it speaks to your emotional and mental maturity that you took it that way. Stop playing the role of the victim.
There is racism literally everywhere. Also, don't move the goal post. Our conversation had a very specific scope that you created. Either argue within those confines or move along.
Furthermore, take that privilege shit down the road. It's lazy, tired, and trite.
You go to a bar and say that to someone and see if they're not insulted.
Something only said by people in a position of privilege that have never experienced bigotry.
I don't know what to tell you man. I tried. I access Lemmy maybe twice a week, and I always see your name. Which means you're probably perpetually online, which is an easy way to become radicalized. Hope things end up working out for you.
What other nonsense. I am "perpetually online" because of two chronic illnesses that give me extremely little energy to do much else. And I'll only be around for four more years so I have no idea what you think I will be radicalized to do.
Maybe ask people what their life is about before assuming.
I don't care enough about you or your life to ask for specifics. Though I find it ironic that I shouldn't make assumptions about you, but you're perfectly ok making assumptions about every judge in Florida. No wait, then you said all of the south.
You don't have to do anything to be radicalized. You can simply have a radical mindset. Which is what you have.
Alright, this conversation hasn't beared any fruit so this where I take my leave. Good luck with whatever it is that you do.
Stop lying.
No one else seems to be confused by the concept of queerphobic Florida judges.
Nope. I told you "why's that." Because Florida judges are bigots. You just seem to not care for that. Maybe you think this man's stand your ground argument is justified?
Edit: also, since when has three been "quite a few?"
Yep, you're on the side of the queerphobes with that "you're the real bigot here" nonsense. It all makes sense now.
Insulting me repeatedly is not going to make this "you're the real bigot, not the people who rightfully hate those icky queers" thing any better, sorry.