91
submitted 1 week ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LostXOR@fedia.io 30 points 1 week ago

For people who don't care about being at the cutting edge and just want something that works reliably (which is most users), that's fine. I've used Mint for years and while it's not the fanciest distro I rarely run into problems and almost everything just works.

[-] MudMan@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

Hard disagree on that being "most people".

I fully agree that Mint has the right UX for mass adoption, but I also agree with the OP that this comes at the cost of being specced for hardware made ten years ago.

I think it's a useful reference point. If you are on a semi-modern display that does VRR and HDR with a newer Nvidia card, want to do some gaming on it, maybe have a secondary display with a different resolution that requires different scaling.... you know, that type of thing, then what you need is at least the level of compatibility and functionality you get on Mint, but with official support out of the box. And you need it like four or five years ago.

Mint existing shows why Linux isn't a mainstream daily driver.

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
91 points (96.9% liked)

Linux

5479 readers
291 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS