18
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DonPiano@feddit.org 9 points 3 days ago

Never heard of any colleague who had issues publishing stuff relating to intelligence, which makes me suspect that the "free of prejudices against this kind of research" bit is maybe a lie. I mean this in the sense that it might be not prejudice but rather just plain old judice, i.e. peer review that prevents edgelords from publishing.

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 11 points 3 days ago

Which views exactly?

Ow you know the ones.

[-] DonPiano@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago

The ones motivated by [Peter Sellers] bold curiosity for the adventure ahead! [/Sellers]?

[-] DonPiano@feddit.org 9 points 3 days ago

"In recent years, the journal has come under increasing attack for publishing research that some people consider racist" lol

[-] DonPiano@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago

Ugh, still waking up so multiple comments.

Even the shittier variants of intelligence related research I know of has no big issues finding a journal. How bad must Intelligence be?

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1003 readers
40 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS