-21

Should we allow one, both, or none?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 16 points 21 hours ago

None.

Racism, as we all (should) know is skin shallow. That is enough. Not being of the "right" color establishes that an individual has no rights, no freedoms, and in extremes cases, not even humanity.

Classism is just a reviewed version of the cast system. Where you are born on the social pyramid dictates your fate. Born poor, die poor.

None are tolerable. All human beings are born equal.

[-] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 17 hours ago

I will absolutely judge people based on their class. You don't come to obtain and maintain massive wealth without being an absolute shit person

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

What you are doing, by taking that position, is just subscribing to the current social model. That's not even a criticism; it's joining the band wagon.

Let's say you have a big success tomorrow and you manage to amass a great fortune. Are you going to give it away? Are you going to do something with your newly found wealth to truly change something for better?

The top three wealth holders in the planet are there because people allowed it. Facebook was just so groudbreaking, so innovative, so useful to connect to people. Amazon is just so convenient, so easy to use. And electric cars never existed before.

They were enabled and still are by the same people that cry today against them. If the notion of true equality really existed, the moment those individuals started becoming too big, people would remove trust and start demanding them to do good, tangible good, for others.

[-] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Let's say you have a big success tomorrow and you manage to amass a great fortune. Are you going to give it away? Are you going to do something with your newly found wealth to truly change something for better?

Yes??? Of course I would?

The top three wealth holders in the planet are there because people allowed it. Facebook was just so groudbreaking, so innovative, so useful to connect to people. Amazon is just so convenient, so easy to use. And electric cars never existed before.

Ohhhh, you're a capitalist

They were enabled and still are by the same people that cry today against them. If the notion of true equality really existed, the moment those individuals started becoming too big, people would remove trust and start demanding them to do good, tangible good, for others.

That's literally what myself and many others are doing? Except in my opinion they are evil until they intentionally drop their net worth to the single digit millions and transfer their companies to the workers who actually made them what they are today

What you are doing, by taking that position, is just subscribing to the current social model. That's not even a criticism; it's joining the band wagon.

Lmao, I'm an anarchist, not a liberal on a band wagon

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago)

Let's say you have a big success tomorrow and you manage to amass a great fortune. Are you going to give it away? Are you going to do something with your newly found wealth to truly change something for better?

Yes??? Of course I would?

I honestly hope so. Until that day, we do not know. Hopefully, you will set the example.

The top three wealth holders in the planet are there because people allowed it. Facebook was just so groudbreaking, so innovative, so useful to connect to people. Amazon is just so convenient, so easy to use. And electric cars never existed before.

Ohhhh, you're a capitalist

Shit. I am? Why?

They were enabled and still are by the same people that cry today against them. If the notion of true equality really existed, the moment those individuals started becoming too big, people would remove trust and start demanding them to do good, tangible good, for others.

That's literally what myself and many others are doing? Except in my opinion they are evil until they intentionally drop their net worth to the single digit millions and transfer their companies to the workers who actually made them what they are today

I can't disagree on that.

What you are doing, by taking that position, is just subscribing to the current social model. That's not even a criticism; it's joining the band wagon.

Lmao, I'm an anarchist, not a liberal on a band wagon

It's easy to just shout out loud, when everyone else already is as well.

I personally like the anarchist proposal: a flat society, without classes. Unfortunately, at the moment, very far from being attainable.

[-] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 minutes ago

I honestly hope so. Until that day, we do not know. Hopefully, you will set the example

This reads to me like you're assuming I'd be a class traitor until proven otherwise, and I don't like that.

Shit. I am? Why?

Sorry, it sounded like you were defending billionaires as if they actually earned their wealth. I'm glad to be wrong, but you do continue to sound like a liberal

It's easy to just shout out loud, when everyone else already is as well

Why do you assume I didnt start until it became trendy? I quit Facebook and Amazon a decade ago, and have been consistently putting my freedom and safety on the line in furtherance of my leftist values for just as long

I can't disagree on that.

So you're not arguing that the upper class isn't evil, you were just under the assumption that I'm an all-talk idealist or something?

Unfortunately, at the moment, very far from being attainable

I'm gonna keep doing praxis anyway

[-] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago

Are people not racist based on accent as well though?

For example Irish people?

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz -1 points 10 hours ago

I'm not directly conected with english speaking countries so that example always evades me but you're right.

The scottish also had it bad with the english as well. And some time back I read a news report on how a man had been insulted in a train for not speaking english, in London. He was speaking welsh...

Racism picks on any small thing to rise divergence, usually something the target of it can't change. But anything works.

[-] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I wasn’t saying you were wrong, I was just wondering if I was. True about the Scot’s, and the Welsh too….and the Cornish. Basically any form of Celt.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago

We're just exchanging ideas here and you brought up a very good point.

But it made think that by contrast, in Africa, several ethnic groups coexist and language was not that big of a concern for conflict.

[-] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca -4 points 21 hours ago

well at least there's one sane person on this website.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 5 points 20 hours ago

It wildly depends on who you ask, so don't waste your praise on me.

this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
-21 points (18.2% liked)

Asklemmy

44123 readers
831 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS