26
submitted 1 year ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/toronto@lemmy.ca

By Lucas Powers · CBC News

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Sure groceries are exempt, but there is a limit on how much you can reasonably spend. At the rate housing and asset prices are, there appears no limit on how much your wealth can grow. So instead of using a proxy metric (spending) to tax people with wealth, just go after it directly instead.

[-] MarkG_108@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You're suggesting a municipal income tax? I doubt that would come to fruition. Again, there is a rebate for those in lower incomes, which I believe addresses your initial concern.

[-] pwnna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Not sure how you got to that conclusion. I said wealth, not income. Wealth inequality is not the same as income inequality and taxing incoming doesn't fix wealth inequality. Neither does taxing consumption, as most people tend to horde their wealth in some sort of asset.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
26 points (100.0% liked)

Toronto

1611 readers
4 users here now

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Friends:
Support lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS