[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 weeks ago

It always surprises me that when making the biggest purchase of their life people put so much trust and blind faith into realtors who aren’t required to have any formal education nor required to have any credentials to do the job.

Maybe they should be required to get a degree that covers topics like geography, land use planning, architecture, and trades related to home construction.

10
submitted 4 weeks ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/toronto@lemmy.ca
[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago

You’re forgetting a fundamental one:

  • Sidewalks
28
submitted 1 month ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/ontario@lemmy.ca
18
submitted 1 month ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/ontario@lemmy.ca
8
submitted 1 month ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/toronto@lemmy.ca
6
submitted 1 month ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
18
submitted 1 month ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
35
submitted 1 month ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
7
18
submitted 1 month ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/toronto@lemmy.ca
45
submitted 1 month ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
6
35
submitted 1 month ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, so much fun to be had on the daily commute, stuck with everyone else from your sleepy suburb on a congested highway moving at glacial speeds because there’s no other option to safely and effectively get around for the people who don’t want to be there and can’t get out of your way.

Sure, you can take that thing out on weekends on country roads, mudding, camping, hauling ATVs to your favourite trails, building you or your buddy’s cottage, whatever you dream - but that still leaves 5 days of the week in traffic hell if you work in a city. Do you really want your neighbours to be left with no options to get out of your way so you can enjoy driving more on those days?

[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sometimes programmers wanna store one file and not care about the details related to what drive and computer it’s on. Sometimes in addition they want to make that file available to a limited number of other people or maybe make it broadly available on a private network or public on the internet.

Amazon’s cloud (AWS) offers a convenient service called Simple Storage Service (S3) to do that with a bunch of reliability and availability guarantees. Those guarantees add to the cost of the service, and not everyone needs them, so some programmers hope that competing discount cloud service providers (CSPs) will eventually offer a compatible service.

Hetzner is a discount CSP with lower guarantees, and that according to this post, released a compatible service.

Competition here is good. AWS is pretty dominant, number 1 worldwide with 33% of the CSP market and the company as a whole makes a lot of profit from being the internet’s corporate landlord.

[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago

I’m surprised there’s so few mentions of AWS in this thread. It’s a huge profit centre for the company and a large portion of the internet is now running off of it. AWS is basically the internet’s landlord now, and the profits generated from being the most popular cloud service provider globally are probably why they can afford to invest so heavily into their logistics infrastructure and retail that people are more familiar with.

[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Redis / Valkey

[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 42 points 8 months ago

But there cannot be a full renaissance without challenging progressive political power, which, unfortunately, has risen in Toronto.

Swing and miss by NatPo. Not that anyone should expect much from an opinion piece from any of a conservative American hedge fund’s papers.

NIMBYs can come in any political stripe and must be countered everywhere.

There’s grains of truth peppered in throughout this piece but it’s light on quality sources.

Cities will have to become denser mixed use places. More car dependent suburban sprawl is not the answer. It’s been proven not fiscally sustainable.

[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

Not as much as they hope it will.

Electric or not, we need less cars in cities, not more. Rather than making the next generation of mildly more sustainable but just as dangerous and space inefficient road congestants, we should be thinking harder about how best to meet people’s mobility needs in more safe, sustainable, and effective ways.

People need options not more car dependency.

Those resources are better used to build up public transportation, (e-)bike shares, sidewalks, and the accompanying infrastructure to go with it all, with seamless handoffs between modes.

Electric cars are here to save the auto industry, not the planet.

[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Driving sucks. If you can, help advocate for alternatives and better planning!

No matter where people live in cities, everyone should have options for walking, biking, or taking public transportation in safe, accessible, and reliable ways to get around.

Zoning needs to change to allow more density and mixed use, bringing people closer to their needs.

[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

From the article:

The existing open-source plugin, which we’ve been working on for a number of years, has served as the building block for RustRover. This plugin will remain open source and freely available on GitHub and the marketplace. However, moving forward, we will be investing our efforts into RustRover, which is closed source.

[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

I N D U C E D D E M A N D

Great for sidewalks, bike paths, and trains, but terrible for cars.

view more: next ›

Grappling7155

joined 1 year ago