this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
40 points (100.0% liked)

GenZedong

4454 readers
86 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml
ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml
Elara@lemmygrad.ml
American_Communist22@lemmygrad.ml
40
How did China get their suicide rates so low compared to Japan and South Korea? (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 1 month ago by King_Simp@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

(Obvious answer is socialism but I would like more specifics)

Often China, South Korea and Japan are treated as the "big three" of stress and expectations. Between their similar college entrance exams, demanding work schedules and environments, and social expectations for people to work hard and get rich and such.

But looking at suicide rates (which are only one piece of the puzzle of course) China places fairly low, at about 6.7 per 100,000 according to Wikipedia, half of Japan's and nearly a quarter of south korea's. Interestingly this is not just a cultural difference, as the Chinese province of Taiwan reports about 16 per 100,000 people, which is even higher than Japan. It also isn't the just case of a high density population compared to low density like Finland and Iceland, since Japan and the ROK fit this designation as well (as well as India, who has a rate even higher than Japan's)

The obvious answer is socialism, but that's a little broad and not how you actually solve things. Not to mention that cuba has a decently high rate too (although considering their current impoverishment it's not surprising). So what happened specifically? Poverty alleviation sure but that can't be all of it, I don't think so anyway.

(Additional notes and questions

A.The DPRK has a rate of 8, nearly a third of the ROK, suck it fake korea

B.Why is venezuala's rate so low? From the source Wikipedia uses its one of the lowest in the world, despite the generally high poverty and instability

C.Why is Afganistan's so low? Unsure if anyone has a concrete answer to this but I'm curious)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Similar in Poland. At elementary and middle education level private is massively expensive but also usually better though that is mostly because constant cuts to public education means that regardless of failing birthrates there is always too much kids in class and too much duties for teachers. At those levels there are no pressure about it though, nobody is even asking which school you finished. But at university level state universities are free and much better while having much more competition while private schools are usually much worse.

[โ€“] juchenecromancer@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Elementary and middle education in India is exactly the same... due to severe budget cuts public education at that level is terrible and most who can afford it settle for private schooling. It's flipped in higher education, although with BJP neoliberalism the public schools have been raising tuition and having funding cut as well (although they are still massively cheaper than private universities).