1048
submitted 1 year ago by Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] American_Badass@hexbear.net 123 points 1 year ago

I know Hexbear skews very, very liberal. I haven't spent much time in other lemmy places.

[-] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Liberal? They’re as extreme as conservatives who call communism everything they don’t like (cause they call everything they don’t like “fascist”)

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 61 points 1 year ago

I believe the comrade is making a joke about our politics. Not everything we don't like is fascism, some of it is liberalism. But of course, we all know what bleeds when a liberal gets scratched.

[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like the communism talk. I don't like the pro russia talk on hexbear.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 48 points 1 year ago

What exactly are you seeing as pro-russia?

As communists we're staunchly anti-NATO and against the US imperialist order. There's a degree of critical support for the Russian Federations struggle against NATO, but thats not really pro-russia, or at least how we would define being pro-russia.

Similarly we have critical support for Iran in its struggle against the US led imperial order, and we support when they do things like engaging in trade with AES like Venezuela. Thats not the same as direct support for the theocracy there or all their domestic policies for example

[-] marx_mentat@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago

They want all the us state department propaganda included with the communism talk.

[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Im no fan of US imperialism, but you all conveniently leave out the alternative to NATO aid in Ukraine right now.

Without NATO aid, Ukraine will just plainly be taken over by Purine Russia.

If you think that end result is OK, then I don't know what to tell you.

As far as Im concerned, Putins expansion is really helping NATOs by giving them a justification to exist.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago

How does communism inform your perspective?

NATO aid and their not allowing Ukraine to negotiate peace is what is prolonging this war. We aren't arguing for all of Ukraine to become Russian territory, which hasn't been the position of the Russian Federation either.

We would like a negotiated peace that alllows the Donbas republics to leave Ukraine and join the Russian Federation as they've voted to do, and a promise for Ukraine to not become part of NATO. That senario is not the alternative you're talking about, or what you're implying we support.

[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We act as if the land wasnt invaded. The quickest way to achieve peace is for Putin yo withdraw. If the Ukrainians push into Russia after a withdraw, then we are having a different conversation.

You cant claim to believe in peace while in another territory.

[-] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The quickest way to achieve peace is for Putin yo withdraw.

And then get couped and have the war continue under the leadership of a right wing hardliner

Please look up critiques of great man theory as it seems relevant to your line of thinking on this matter.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

I don't even know what this means because it has no grounding in reality.

They can't negotiate peace because they are in a war? How is it possible to resolve this conflict in any realistic way if thats the criteria?

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] CriticalResist8@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

do you sincerely think Ukraine will be like "it's all good you were a good sport we're gonna end the match here, everyone go home" if Russia suddenly decided to up and leave.

[-] edge@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even if Russia were to withdraw to pre-war borders, Ukraine would keep fighting because they insist on taking Crimea which is a large majority Russians who want to be part of Russia.

Crimea has never truly been Ukrainian. It was internally transferred to the Ukrainian SSR in the 1950s, but its population was Russian then and stayed Russian the whole time since. But Ukraine insists on having it back.

And if they did somehow get it back, they would start ethnically cleansing it of Russians. I hope you understand how that’s a bad thing.

[-] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Without NATO aid, Ukraine will just plainly be taken over by Purine Russia.

The war would end, a whole lot of people would stop getting killed, and it would open a sliver of space to organize on class lines instead of nationalist ones.

As it is, it is basically illegal to be a communist or an anarchist in Ukraine, and the country is under martial law with NATO-armed and trained fascist brigades doling out summary justice. Could it get worse? Why should the left advocate for people to die on the hill of a country which arrests communists, dismantles labor unions, and liquidates public infrastructure on internet auctions for foreign investors?

If you take the most vulgar Anarchist approach, all states are bad, full stop. Political practice doesn't even operate on that paradigm. You struggle to undermine oppressive hierarchical systems that you come in direct contact with through direct action. If you take the vulgar Leninist approach, the Proletariat should struggle for the overthrow of their Bourgeoisie (this would include the proletariat of Ukraine and Russia respectively, as well as the proletariat of Western countries which see this conflict only as a means to strengthen their military alliances and diplomatic positions). Of course, the situation is too nuanced to apply such a vulgar approach, but that should be the STARTING POINT for anybody who considers themselves anti-capitalists. You should be able to justify any deviation from those bedrock positions.

[-] motherfucker@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Signing off on this comment as Cool and Good. Hexbear seal of approval or something like that.

[-] RoomAndBored@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

Thank you PP, whether PoA responds to this comment or not, I found it very clear and insightful.

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

Im no fan of US imperialism, but you all conveniently leave out the alternative to NATO aid in Ukraine right now.

Nope it's mentioned all the time: diplomacy, peace talks, and to make that even possible, establish legitimacy by abiding by your own agreements. The undermining of all of these things has been discussed at length. They don't really need to be rehashed in our spaces for the benefit of new people that don't ask questions, though.

Without NATO aid, Ukraine will just plainly be taken over by Purine Russia.

lol RF could take over UA any time they wanted to if they took the NATO approach of completely destroying civilian life and essential resources via bombing. Military "aid" to Ukraine just keeps Ukrainian soldiers getting killed en masse, which is characterized by Russia as their compromise version of Denazification.

As far as Im concerned, Putins expansion is really helping NATOs by giving them a justification to exist

NATO obviously requires no credible justification to exist. This doesn't matter.

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] ComradeCmdrPiggy@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

What if I told you that in March 2022 the Ukrainians and Russians came this close to closing a deal that would end the war... that is, before the Ukrainians decided to accept effectively unlimited NATO aid in exchange for scrapping said deal?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] edge@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

Without NATO aid, Ukraine will just plainly be taken over by Purine Russia.

No it wouldn’t. At most they would take the southern half, Novorossiya. The rest they just want a guarantee won’t align with the West.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Flaps@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

As far as Im concerned, Putins expansion is really helping NATOs by giving them a justification to exist.

You have that backwards and are welcome to learn about the context behind the conflict, just ask

[-] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Without NATO aid, Ukraine will just plainly be taken over by Purine Russia

Ah, I think I've found the issue. Here at Hexbear we only support Pyrimidine Russia. We hate fuckin' cytosine, don't we folks?

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pointing out propaganda is not being pro-russia. Wanting an end to the American empire is not being pro-russia

[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you are being reductive. One can simultaneously be anti Russia and Anti US imperialism.

Idk why America being bad means oligarchic Russia is good. There's no nuance in your ideology. The US generally sucks. They happen to be in the correct side of this conflict. They arent always, but here they are.

[-] Egon@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you are being reductive. One can simultaneously be anti Russia and Anti US imperialism.

Yes we agree.

Idk why America being bad means oligarchic Russia is good.

So pointing out American lies shouldn't be an issue, right? Pointing out propaganda shouldn't be an issue, right?

There's no nuance in your ideology.

I'm not the one boiling this down to good guys and bad guys being on "the right side".
I support Russia in this conflict insofar as a defeat of Ukraine would be a defeat of the American empire, which would help usher in a multi-polar world - as we are seeing now - which aids national self-determination (as we are starting to see around the world, from the west African countries throwing off the yoke of France and the IMF, south American countries collaborating and throwing out US stooges, and middle eastern countries seeking peace with each other).

The US generally sucks. They happen to be in the correct side of this conflict.

If the US sucks, and the us has been shown to lie, and the us continues to lie, then ask yourself why the us supports Ukraine and to what end. Ask yourself why NATO felt the need to sabotage peace talks. Ask yourself why NATO felt the need to make Zelensky maintain an idea that Ukraine would join NATO, after being told it wouldn't happen behind closed doors.

They arent always, but here they are.

Lmao is this your idea of nuance? "Well all the other times they were shown to be ghouls, but this time where I'm bought in, they're definitely not"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (112 replies)
load more comments (318 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1048 points (81.3% liked)

Memes

45656 readers
1042 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS