this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
636 points (97.3% liked)

Funny

8534 readers
2148 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 78 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

So... how do you reduce something like people crossing a border beyond one hundred percent ?

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 121 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People trying to get out of the country, I guess

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I thought of this one but a deportation or just leaving aren't illegal crossings.... So it wouldn't work!

And trying to get out of the country crossing illegally is still an illegal crossing, so, it doesn't make sense

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 57 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They're crossing on the opposite direction now

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago

And bringing additional people with them!

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

I also considered this one, illegally crossing in the opposite direction is still illegally crossing, so, it doesn't explain the math

[–] CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For some reason, people will sometimes flip the fraction when calculating decreasing percentages, so this roughly means that the old number of crossings is beyond one hundred percent greater than the current number of border crossings. It's really dumb

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ohhhhhh omg now this makes sense. Thank you!

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] higgsboson@dubvee.org 1 points 2 weeks ago