this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
55 points (96.6% liked)
World News
2519 readers
140 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What this ridiculous "great man theory" style analysis tells me is that even in decline, they refuse to take responsibility for anything. They tried to have total control over Russia and couldn't, tried to encroach on it and overextended in the effort, and now they're acting like it was a grand game of chess they were outplayed on instead of the material conditions on the ground. Infantile reductionist framing of complicated factors involving many countries.
The great man theory shit is especially insane here because Putin was literally allowed into power by Russian and western oligarchs as a compromise to the Russian people to prevent communism from coming back. Its actually hard to even imagine a more clear example of important people being a result of their societies and conditions rather than the other way around.
That's a great point.
Have any good articles on this? My knowledge of that period of Russian history is pretty spotty.
They didn't even try though, yeltsin asked to try NATO and 90s Russia was ripe for western investment (exploitation)
The west could have integrated Russia into the capitalist world order, but instead made it clear that cold war sentiments were going to stay
Well, maybe my understanding of it is off in some way, but what I meant by "total control" is they did not want to be partners with Russia (rejecting them joining NATO) but only to subjugate them (dissolve USSR, make them subservient to western interests) and this backfired on them.