this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
637 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

66892 readers
4909 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 268 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

> FAA prevents SpaceX from launching more rockets
> Musk guts the FAA
> FAA no longer stopping rockets
> Musk decries nobody will stop other people's rockets

[–] dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 91 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

SpaceX biggest competitor is NASA/JPL Musk guts NASA

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How is NASA a competitor to SpaceX?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 week ago

Because we live in clown world

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They both shoot rockets up in the sky. Our government could pay NASA to do it, or pay Space X.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

NASA does not build it's own rockets (anymore) they make the payloads. NASA will never make rockets as good/cheap as a companies like ULA and SpaceX.

Take a look at the cluster fuck that is the SLS if you want an example

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can Space X make the payloads?

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

SpaceX can make the payloads, and they already do in the form of starlink.

NASA carries out research/experiments something that spaceX probably doesn't want to compete in since for the most part it does not pay

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Uh, basically no.

NASA has experiments to run, spaceX has no idea what science NASA is interested in doing. So having SpaceX make the payload doesn't really make a lot of sense.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So it sounds like they are codependent at this point. The bigger the nasa budget the better for space X.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I mean, that's always been the case. That's literally spaceX's primary job, putting things in space for NASA. It's the same for every launch provider in the US.

Federal funding for space exploration?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

->Musk's team launches the most expensive firework ever blowing up and disrupting air traffic and destroying the environment again for the eighth time