this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
637 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

66975 readers
4012 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This very much ignores that there are tangible benefits from the successes of SpaceX’s engineers and scientists.

Also, who’s this Elon guy? He sounds like a twat.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Everything SpaceX is doing and has done could have been done by NASA had NASA been given the equivalent funds and leeway. This has been covered multiple times in many interviews of NASA scientists and engineers. Simply put, NASA cannot afford and is not allowed to take risks. They are not allowed to blow up ships over Florida and the Caribbean until they figure it out. They used to be allowed, but not anymore.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Probably done better since there is no profit motive.

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I don’t disagree with that