this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
215 points (100.0% liked)

World News

34700 readers
755 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 123 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

There's no point in talking to Trump because he has shown time and time again that his words are worthless. He's also an attention addict and megalomaniac, so talking to him, especially if it's televised and on the world stage, is giving him exactly what he wants.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

They probably saw the Zelensky "talks" and decided to save their time.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 17 points 1 week ago

IDK, he sure didn't seem to want to do any more debates during the campaign after the last one

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd argue that goes for any US president. Even if they're completely genuine, everything can change on a dime when the next admin comes into power.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

In a sense that's true for any country, though. The only differences are (1) how often the policy changes and (2) by how much. US used to have a 4-year cycle and much less variance in the policies and so it made some sense to get into long-term agreements. Even in the last 8 years, agreements reached by Trump were continued by Biden (e.g. NAFTA). Now though the cycle is like 4 days and the policy swings are 180°, so it only makes sense to enter into extremely short-term, transactional agreements, or if you have no other choice (like Ukraine).

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's demonstrably false. Take China as an example where there is a stable political system, a single party in charge, and decisions are made across decades.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We can agree that China is a more stable partner than the US. My point is that party leadership can also change there, leading to policy changes - it just doesn't happen as often and there's usually no dramatic swings when it does. It's a scale, not a binary thing.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago

That's the whole point though, it's the erratic swings in policy that make the US impossible to work with. China doesn't change policy on whim, and it acts rationally. This makes it possible to make long term plans with China and have confidence that China will commit to these plans. The same cannot be said about the US where policy is volatile and unpredictable.