this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
89 points (97.8% liked)

News

27476 readers
4177 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Earlier this year, Michael Woolfolk attended a legislative committee in Georgia where lawmakers considered for a third year whether to compensate the 45-year-old for the 19 years he spent behind bars for a 2002 killing before charges against him were dismissed.

Behind him sat Daryl Lee Clark, also 45, who spent 25 years in prison for a 1998 murder conviction that was vacated over a series of legal and police errors. It was his second attempt to obtain compensation.

Georgia is one of 11 states with no law on compensating people found to have been wrongfully convicted. Individuals seeking compensation take their cases to the legislature, where they seek a lawmaker to sponsor a resolution to pay them. Critics say it mires the process in politics.

Lawmakers have been considering legislation to move the decision to judges, but now it’s unclear if that will pass this year.

“We need to take care simply of people who have lost so many years of their lives and their ability to make money, have a job, have a family, create stability,” Republican Rep. Katie Dempsey, a sponsor of the Georgia bill, told The Associated Press. “Many are at the age where they would be looking at their savings, and instead, there’s none.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

You want us to just give money to someone who was arrested and convicted?




Edit:
I guess the /s didn’t come across in my wording. It’s actually a relief to see all those downvotes.

I’m just so baffled that this could be “a hard sell” for anyone.

Payment should come right from the pensions of the department whose officer committed the arrest. No passing this off onto the taxpayers.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not just give money. The money is just a start. All the people involved in the case should also be investigated to see who knew they might be innocent, and then those people should be criminally charged. Putting an innocent person in jail should have personal criminal liability attached.

And everyone who completes their sentence should be given enough money to restart their life along with social support to make it happen.

Knowingly putting someone in jail who is innocent should carry severe punishments. I think twice the time the innocent persons sentence is about right.

[–] BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Depriving someone of years of their life isn't a trivial thing. If someone was wrongfully convicted of a crime, the time they spend in jail is time that they could have been spending making a career, saving for retirement, building equity, etc. The things people do to prepare for retirement.

Should we just say "oops, our bad, no hard feelings right?" and just leave them to be homeless?

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you lock them up for a crime they did not commit? Yeah. It's called "damages" and it's a well established legal concept.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

If they’re so innocent, why’d they get arrested and jailed?? Check mate.