this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
5 points (59.3% liked)

Out of the loop

12085 readers
25 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He expressed that a shutdown will favor Trump and Musk, so sounds reasonable?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cptn_Slow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I couldn't find the specifics in a quick Google search, and since this is OOTL I guess I'll ask here.

And I know I'm about to be shit on for even asking, genuinely, what are the parts of the bill that will hurt people?

All the articles I could find were just how trump would weaponize the shutdown, nothing I could find stated the specifics of the bill.

[–] artificialfish@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

From what I’ve heard it’s just a complete funding cut to all the agencies he’s promised to “destroy”, whose firings have already affected lives like with USAID, the EPA, etc. Idk if there’s medical cuts in there, but there’s definitely cuts to research grants on medicine. And instead of using the savings to pay off the deficit, he’s using it to fund tax cuts to his billionaire friends.

I will never understand how Americans are dumb enough to believe you can cut taxes and pay off the deficit. It’s like if you had credit card debt then quit your job. Oh and in this case you don’t get to quit your job, it’s your neighbor in the mansion next door who probably got us into debt to begin with or owns the debt.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I will never understand how Americans are dumb enough to believe you can cut taxes and pay off the deficit.

If your cuts to programs are greater than the loss from cutting taxes it's absolutely possible. That's simple math. Not that I agree with trump obviously but your argument is flawed.

[–] artificialfish@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well that’s what they say they are doing but it’s still not flawed. If I wanted to pay off my debt effectively and quickly I’d get a better job AND reduce my spending. So higher taxes (preferably on the rich) and reduce spending (preferably on non essentials like the military overspending)

All I’m saying is as my parents let’s say you would question my decisions if I did what you suggest, cut my hours but cut my spending MORE. That would be kinda sus.

That’s a much more logical approach, and I think the argument makes it pretty clear that fixing the deficit is not in Republican interests, it’s just lip service. Which is a big problem since the deficit could destroy the economy in the near future.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Oh I agree. Also some of these programs are pretty important. And even the less important ones exist for a reason. I'm not necessarily against trimming the fat but it should be given more consideration than "CLOSE ALL THE THINGS!!"