this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
90 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10295 readers
253 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not quite, but maybe close. I'm a leftist Islamist (I don't think rightwing Islamism even exists as a coherent ideology but just in case). See why I didn't elaborate? I have coherent arguments for why it's a good ideology even in a purely secular sense, but no Lemming would ever listen to you stan for a 1400 year old book.
Aside from the obvious stuff like promoting mutual aid, grassroots agitation efforts are probably your best bet. Organize in workplaces and other places where people meet, get them angry and suggest effective courses of action. For example there are many one-day protests and sit ins, which is fine and all but why is nobody striking? The goal is a mass movement that can then turn out in mass protests or a semi-spontaneous general strike. But setting aside the specific tactics I think will work, my pitch is: The top of the political pyramid is either incapable or unwilling to help you, but the bottom isn't, so put your focus there.
Boycotts with a time limit lose most of their effectiveness. If you'll boycott boycott permanently or until you see change, so I guess that's another thing to focus on. You can take a page from BDS's playbook there. Also you're not supposed to be able to keep up with public marches and sit ins; you want people turning out in the millions all over the country.
All that, but more of it and longer and also strikes.
Okay? Being out for the count before anything actually happens (and it will because of the regime's authoritarian incompetence) doesn't seem to be good strategy, but there's no point talking about this.
respectfully: this is just not a serious proposal. and the fact that you think nobody is doing these things—rather than what is actually the case, which is that people do them but they are simply not effective or easy-to-scale acts of political praxis in an American context—is indicative that you should stop making confidently bad tactical prescriptions.
and i'm not even going to address your fantastical idea of how to build a spontaneous general strike out of "mass protests" when it is evident you have bad tactical prescriptions. you're not even treading new ground here, really. Peter Camejo's speech "Liberalism, ultraleftism, or mass action" is the definitive dunk on your flavor of politically delusional theorycrafting, and that speech turns 55 this year:
you're right, people have never martyred themselves (and, in a sense "been out for the count before anything happens") for successful political change before. do you realize how ridiculous this sounds? you are the classic person who--even if they are legitimately radical, which i don't think you are--upholds the status quo by, in the words of Martin Luther King, Jr, "lives by a mythical concept of time" and always wants to wait for a more convenient season to do something. but plainly, the more convenient season will never come if nobody does anything because they might be "out for the count".