this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
222 points (99.1% liked)

politics

22104 readers
4620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ha.

That's not how laws work.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago

For some reason, my ctrl+Z isn't working. Undo - I want to undo!

[–] Lemmist@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Juridical laws aren't like physical laws. You can change them however you want. There is no any objective limitation.

So laws work the way the master wants them to.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Except this is written law, it's pretty clear in the constitution. If the state refuses to respect our inalienable rights then the citizens are left with few options on how to respond

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

All rights are alienable if you don’t believe rights exist

[–] bishbosh@lemm.ee 2 points 21 hours ago

There have already been several rulings against the constitution for places within 100 miles of the border, it's never been more than a piece of paper and decorum.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Just like the Bible. Cherry pick and intentionally misinterpret to push an agenda.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not really, I mean any Judge can impart context if either side raises the issue, all the way from the local up to federal. At the Federal level things get into constitutional law, and what exactly constitutes personal freedoms, and anybody subverting the constitution is open to criminal AND civil penalties. That's how it's supposed to work at least.

In reality, these assholes are going to try and use this against people before a judge can shoot it down (they can't preempt it, really). This is another test to try and see where things break, and what they can get away with.

They show up, sweep you away to some hidden prison before anyone can stop them, and before a judge can outright say it's unconstitutional (like it even needs to be fucking said), and by that time they've already done whatever they intended to do.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Well, sort of - the extreme end of that is the sovcit worldview.