this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
980 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

67151 readers
6815 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Disclaimer - not an electromagnetic scientist wizard

My understanding is that EMPs are more of a concern for the tiny electronics on computers versus relatively large motors or batteries. So, an electric vehicle is still at risk, but I don’t think it’d be any more at risk than any ICE car that’s all computerized anyways.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

It would probably mess up the controlling computer though.

Occasionally cars get hit by lightning and that usually causes a lot of errors and glitches and sometimes it totally writes off the vehicle.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

“Everything’s computer”

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

From what I understand, the vulnerability of a chip has to do with the operating voltage of the chip. As chips have become smaller, and more efficient, they have also become less vulnerable to EMP. Higher voltage components are more vulnerable, like the motors, but I don't think you are going to get a man-portable device that will damage them. Maybe one that would fit in a vehicle, but you would have to be very close (inverse square law) and you would have to find a way to not fry your own vehicle.

Not a chip designer, nor an electrician, if anyone with more credibility wants to jump in here, please do.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With all the touch screens and computer controlled door handles I wouldn‘t bet on a Tesla in this showdown.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago

thats one of the many downsides of making everything computer

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nuke type EMPs are a threat to very long wires, like miles long ones used to transmit power. The blast causes a ripple in the earths magnetic field that induces current over huge distances. But I don't know what a more handheld device would affect.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

Got it, so it's best to use a nuke just to be safe.

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Electric motors work by inducing a magnetic field with coils of wire, so I’m sure a strong enough EMP would disrupt it temporarily, but I don’t know if it would meaningfully damage anything after the EMP ceased.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

They're made specifically to deal with high electromagnetic flux, so it definitely wouldn't hurt them long term. Best bet would be something higher frequency to mess with the computers.