Last December the Court of Milan ordered Cloudflare to block sites added to Italy's Piracy Shield system. Cloudflare sees itself as a neutral intermediary but increasingly frustrated rightsholders say it should play a more active role by assisting their fight against piracy. A decision issued by the same court now requires Google to poison its Public DNS to prevent access to pirate sites. It was handed down on March 11 without Google being heard in the matter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] blinkfink182@lemm.ee 5 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Genuine question: is the performance up to par with Google or cloud flare or quad9? Been looking to move to a more privacy focused dns provider but obviously want to keep performance up too.

[–] oeightsix@lemmy.nz 5 points 18 hours ago

Try NextDNS. It was built by Netflix architects. Even at the bottom of the world I have found their ultralow network's performance to be very good.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Google and cloudflare has the resources (and servers) for high uptime and speed. Youre going to have to make a trade off.

[–] blinkfink182@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago

Definitely understand that. Was just curious how it was for folks.

[–] nomugisan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago

I have no way of knowing. I think they're the same imo