this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
136 points (94.2% liked)

United Kingdom

4563 readers
119 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Even with the caveats about limited data and untangling causation and correlation, the statistics are striking: the first year of a scheme in Wales where the speed limit on urban roads was lowered to 20mph resulted in about 100 fewer people killed or seriously injured.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 days ago (4 children)

In my home town ALL roads are 30kph, and like 50% of the intersections are roundabouts. The result is traffic just continuously flowing and you arrive much faster than before with the roads at 50kph. Other side effects are less gasoline use, less pollution from gas and tires, less accidents, less noise, basically less bad and more good.

Add to that the great cycle and walking infrastructure and yeah, of course I'm talking about the Netherlands

Queue the replies with "but you could nevah do this in [Canada | United States | England | Mexico | Russia | China | whatever] because [too cold | too many mountains | too large distances | whatever]

[–] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We actually have pockets like this in the US. A small town nearby has nothing but roundabouts and max 30mph and it's makes the area very walkable. Parts of Pasadena CA is similar. It does happen but not on a grand scale. The areas we have adopted this method are very pleasant.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which always makes me wonder why, if it's so nice, this isn't done everywhere

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Costs money to rip and replace existing infrastructure. Counties and cities with less income can’t afford to make such drastic changes unless it’s a higher priority than the other 25 things that need funding

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago

To be fair in NL a lot of people ignore the speed limits if the road invites you to drive faster (not enough traffic calming stuff). Not a lot and still driving safely but for example there's this huge straight road near my house that they changed to 30 recently but didn't make any changes to the infrastructure and pretty much everyone still drives 50 on it. Also on highways it's 100 everywhere during the day but you see a lot driving 110/120 where there's no speed control.

[–] PeaceNBullets@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wonder what the optimal speed is to maximize speed and flow while minimizing accidents.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

If it's mixing bikes, pedestrians and cars? 30kph is about the maximum safe speed for cars because of the maximum speeds of bikes, and even then they'd need to be on separate roads