this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
687 points (98.6% liked)

Comic Strips

15583 readers
1958 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
687
xRule (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by FenrirIII@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think its more murky than that.

There was a whole story arc about mutant growth hormone, which was derived from skin cells scraped off people like the Owl and other supers.

This MGH gave humans temporary mutant powers, and cites its origin as the X-Gene.

Confusingly though, it still tries to draw an arbitrary distinction between inherited mutants and somatic ones.

Origin

While it is most of the time extracted from mutants, it can also be extracted/synthesized from other super-powered individuals, but the source of their superpowers must alter their genetic make-up. For example, the Owl or Spider-Woman are not mutants, but their powers come from genetic mutations, and they were both used as MGH sources.

My understanding of this, is that anyone who has a non-fatal mutation of their X-factor gene develops mutant powers and abilities and, if permanent, becomes a mutant.

"Traditional" mutants inherit the X-factor, and are mutants from birth. That's the only distinction I can see, and seems like a bit of a weak distinction tbh.