this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
1332 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

6634 readers
1354 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gil2455526@lemmy.eco.br 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To make it more sci-fi: We have only found such thing in one planet in the whole galaxy, maybe universe.

[–] slaveOne@reddthat.com 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

That's not saying much, since we have only observed roughly 0.0000001% of our galaxy's planets. For all we know there are more planets with trees than without.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, it wouldn't have been surprising if you said universe, bur in our Galaxy?! That's crazy, when does a planet count as observed?

[–] slaveOne@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Since we are talking about trees, I would say when we are able to tell if a planet has trees or not.

[–] taxiiiii@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Lol, fair enough. I got zero clue how we'd find that out efficiently.

[–] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I know you probably just typed a random small number, but you’re gunna need at least 10 more zeros to be close. Absolutely mind boggling

[–] slaveOne@reddthat.com 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I figured it was enough zeros to drive the point.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)