Part of the never ending battle to categorize every chemical as either "good" or "bad"
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2025
11 points (86.7% liked)
4chan Fails
137 readers
1 users here now
A community dedicated to documenting and debunking fallacious arguments and misleading claims found on 4chan. Whether it's cherry-picked statistics, misleading comparisons, or outright fabrication, we shine a light on the worst logic the imageboard has to offer. Share screenshots, analyze arguments, and discuss where they go wrong. Whether it's science denial, historical revisionism, or bad math, let's break it down!
Could it be disproved with 5 seconds of research? Then it will fit in perfectly here!
founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's proven more co2 will expand forests and make nature grow quick, that's not why co2 is bad. Co2 traps the planets heat like a blanket, which make temperature rise which dries out plants and create extreme weather.
Do those generators actually generate CO2 or do they just somehow pump it in from outside?
Edit: I looked it up, apparently it's just doing it by burning natural gas, so it's definitely terrible for the environment and super wasteful.
Exactly. Location, location, location. Just as ice chunks the size of small nations do not belong cleaved off of the Antarctic shelf to float out into the ocean. Or how drought belongs in arid climates, not South Carolina.
If it dries out plants why do greenhouse growers buy CO2 generators?! GOTCHA!!!
It's not the co2 but the heat that dries out plants, greenhouse growers just open a window if it gets to hot in there