this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
72 points (93.9% liked)
Privacy
1831 readers
137 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Anything not selfhosted and/or decentralized, including VPNs, is, by design, not 100% privacy-first.
The service being decentralized doesn't really do anything about privacy, I'd even imagine it being harder to implement privacy controls on decentralized services.
Also the potential privacy "gains" from VPN rely on the fact that there's very large number of users using that service, making it harder to connect the dots. This basically means that self-hosting it for privacy is a bad idea, though it always depends on your threat model.
Lemmy is decentralized, FOSS and can be self-hosted, but it's absolutely not even near "privacy-first" design besides allowing pseudonymous sign-up.
Now thundermail promises some level of privacy, but we're yet to see much. Are the mailbox databases encrypted with customer owned keys, and mailflow logs not collected? That'd be my first question to determine if they're truly privacy-first.