this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
497 points (99.2% liked)
History Memes
3514 readers
5 users here now
THIS COMM HAS MOVED
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As often said, no academic argues Jesus was not a historical figure. Only militant terminally online atheists do.
I'm not talking about whether Jesus existed or not. The bible is not a historic accord is what I'm saying.
Still, Simon/Peter could just as fine be as real as the person historically named Jesus. Assuming Jesus wasn't talking to imaginary friends all day.
That’s not their point. Their point is the Bible isn’t a reliable source.
Got you, no argument against that