this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3646 readers
122 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I thought this was interesting, seeing the views of a young adult who supports Reform. The article is about him having a date with a Green-voting young woman.

What are your thoughts about the growth of Reform, especially among young adults?

Having said that though, it looks like Reform's voting base still skews older. If you look at YouGov's most recent data here (as of the time of me writing this) you can see the following:

  • 15% of 18-24 year-olds support Reform
  • 20% of 25-49 year-olds support Reform
  • 26% of 50-64 year-olds support Reform
  • 29% of 65+ year-olds support Reform
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

UK history is dishonest and delusional. It does us no favours.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

I learned history in Scotland. There was no sugar-coating the evils of the 'English' colonial machine.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

Agreed. Not sure anyone else's is much better. Africa mainly because Europe destroyed it. But all nations tend to tell themselves a rosy picture of their past.

Africa unfortunatly dose not have the media industry to tell what truth they can find.

But if you know any. Id Love to read any good fiction based on their history especially west Africa. That is after all how the west built our own biased stories.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

Definitely depends on who teaches history, my history teacher was far from the best, but they didn’t gloss over the darker parts of our history, and certainly never justified the empire as anything more than a power grab by a nation that took because it could.

It’s certainly dangerous to have too rosy a view of our past, but I don’t think our history is exactly a secret.

That said, we do have a skewed view of the good and bad actions in our history, but I’m less convinced that’s a serious problem, it might even be beneficial, if framed correctly (ie we can’t hide when we’re sampling a rare good moment amongst a sea of horror).

To use an example from another nations history to avoid bias, statistically speaking it wouldn’t be justified for Germany to teach about Schindler, he was one unusual individual and not representative at all. But it seems critical that they do teach about him, because he represents the hope of a better nation buried within the darkness, they need stories like that to show that the making things better is always possible.

Maybe it’s important to teach both the overall horror of our past (to discourage fools thinking the empire was a good thing), and also focus on the rare moments when good came through nonetheless, because those are the moments we need to continue creating, and burying them under cynicism (even accurate cynicism) helps nobody?

Or maybe I’m overthinking it.