640
US citizen wrongfully arrested by border patrol in Arizona held for nearly 10 days
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
640 points (99.1% liked)
News
28902 readers
5142 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Single mother, works in a minor administrative clerical capacity for an Immigration and Customs Enforcement office, has two school age children and without this job she's on the street and can't take care of these kids. She desperately needs this job but is really upset about the news lately, contacting her representatives, protesting when she can and stands ready to offer shelter in her home to anyone in need of a safe space. Yet in this hypothetical, under your rules, not only do you claim that this person has demonstrated they're okay with going along with illegal and immoral actions but that they're also a bad person. No allowance for circumstance or the fact that this is an unprecedented situation.
I am aware. I used the example to draw a parallel. I would have thought engaging in the same behavior that your upset about might make you stop and think; guess not.
Apply the So What principle: So what if I, as a private citizen, make a judgement about people who work for a government office? What's the practical impact for this oh-so-unfairly-maligned hypothetical person you constructed? Nothing.
Now, what's the practical impact when a government agency denies due process to people when it unlawfully detains them? Oh, yeah, that does seem like a real and substantive impact, doesn't it?
I haven't denied anyone's rights to their life or their liberty, so you can take your false equivalency and shove it.
It’s a hypothetical so I’m not sure how you’d measure it but you’re certainly creating a division and fostering an us/them mentality. What purpose does it serve to make a broad statement that’s backed only by emotion and supposition that anybody associated with ICE is a bad person? Other than to make you feel better and more righteous?
It sure does! And we should all of us be against a government that does that. I think I could get on board with a statement like “Any person that knowingly and willingly helps the US government deprive any person of their rights in violation the US Constitution or the law is a bad person”.
A fascist is a fascist, doesn't fuckin matter if they are "only doing their job"
A fascist is an advocate or follower of the political philosophy or system of fascism.
A janitor is a person whose job is to clean and maintain a building or property.
A janitor can be a fascist but they can also just be a janitor.
If you want to claim that any level of culpability makes a person a fascist then I’d say if you’re American and of voting age you’re a fascist because you have culpability in what’s happening right now. If you’re a user of any American corporate product where that corporation contributed to the current administration then you’re a fascist because you have culpability.
I like how you are trying to steer the conversation in one way, in some sort of philosophical ideology. However, I don't care. Fuck Nazi's, doesn't matter if their a struggling mom, idiot on the internet pretending to force a conversation, or ICE. Fuck em all.
And oh yeah, I totally have so much power as an individual to drive the piss ass politics in a country of 330 million. Right, it's my fault?
Maybe your knowledge of Nazi Germany is lacking, because not everyone was a fascist there either... those people went to concentration camps or were killed. Guess what? My ass will eventually be on the chopping block, you evasive fool. I know I'll be fighting when the time comes, you stay at home, pretend to be righteous over wherever you live and close the fucking blinds bootlicker.
and I like how you're trying to steer the conversation in exactly the same way but in a different direction.
I mean seriously, you call the hypothetical person in some low level clerical/administrative role a fascist because they won't quit because it's simply not that easy to do so, yet in the same breath you say "I totally have so much power as an individual to drive the piss ass politics in a country of 330 million" -- hypocrite much?
Would you say you're taking issue with someone making a broad, generalized statement about a group of people based on one commonality?