this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
1720 points (98.8% liked)
People Twitter
6857 readers
901 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Can you provide proof humans are actually damaging the earth? Just curious, because there is a lot of science out there saying it is not.
I agree with you though.
No, there isn't. There is not a single reputable scientist alive in the world today who doubts the existence of man-made climate change. The Greenhouse Effect is science we explain to literal 5 year olds. Anyone espousing otherwise is either, a complete shill, or grossly misinformed by the propaganda of the same people responsible for the microplastics currently occupying the area found in the space between your ears. Do not be this obtuse.
Why did global temperatures drop during the industrial revolution then, if it contributes so much to man made climate change ? Not doubting micro plastics. I'm only talking about climate. The climate naturally changes over time. Native Americans burned entire forests for hunting land, for example, not to mention volcanoes.
Bullshit, made up by billionaires to continue to obfuscate the literal ecocide of our planet in exchange for profits. Tired, boring, shill shit. Why does the one rebelling against the mainstream, the guys who are "just asking questions" repeat the same lie told by 'The Man' over and over again and how it just so happens to serve the bottom line of those destroying the Earth for those profits. Indoctrination, that's how I explain it. Also, global climate models *did not exist * in the 1800's we started modelling climate change in the 1960's. So, your data can't possibly be accurate in relation to what we have now, because our methodology is just so much better thanks to the advent of technology and improved record keeping. Models, which have been shown to be frighteningly accurate and actually less than what is actively progressing right now, due to the massive additional carbon emissions created by Amazon.com's influence on the global supply chain. You're wrong and you'll continue to be wrong and present tired, dis-proven talking points that serve the small number of men that will destroy us all because of the capitalist hellscape they have created with fiat money. A mass hallucinatio of a valuable resource that does not exist. But, I'd rather look for a solution than continue to debate you. Not everyone can be saved, it's not worth trying.
I like it! Good points. I don't use Amazon by the way, and try to get others to do the same but it's a hard battle. I'm sure I waste in other ways but I try. People need to have a little more curiosity and creativity in reusing or making stuff themselves, not buying shit they don't need. The real issue is billionaires with a carbon footprint 10000 times bigger than any of us could imagine. And I don't think any of us can stop that, unless we boycott literally every company.
Yeah, who are the same dudes who want to destroy the earth in exchange for profit, by pretending global climate change is not the single largest existential threat to the working class. When you're rich, you can be anywhere you need to be to avoid weather catastrophies.