462
Elizabeth Warren Marks 100 Days Of Trump By Reading Aloud 100 Reports Of His Corruption
(www.huffpost.com)
this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
462 points (98.3% liked)
politics
23602 readers
2440 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That'll show em /s
They are minority in senate and congress so not sure what you’re expecting here.
At least not vote for cabinet picks.
Can't be filibustered, and as was the case with Pete Hegseth even if every Dem said NO and even 3 Republicans said NO they still had enough votes to appoint them.
It was kind of a "choosing the devil you know" situation.
Then, all Dems should say no.
Do or don't, it doesn't matter.
Optics matter, regardless of how much it helps. Why do you think Elizabeth Warren is doing this stunt? How much difference do you think it made? When Dems vote with Republicans after all the heinous shit they've shown this year, they are failing to stand for their principles. OTOH, if Warren didn't do this stunt, no one would actually complain or criticise her.
So you think all Democrats are compromised and that Warren should be criticized for speaking out against Trump?
You don't exactly have the optics of the resistance yourself, my dude.
Nope, I'm saying performative actions are performative actions, but one type shows to the voters how united Dems are against fascism, and the other doesn't. You are way too supportive of the latter and dismissive of the former, which makes me suspicious of your own agenda.
My agenda is to give people confidence in the Democratic Party and remove as many Republicans as possible. Building up our allies to stand against our enemy.
Dismissing the importance of showing the voters how they stand against fascism is not how you give people the confidence in the Democratic Party, it's how you keep them from winning the next election. Its these types of performative action that only relies on talk and not action is what will keep the Democrats from regaining the lost trust from the voters.
There is no possible action, as we've already discussed that in depth in this thread. The only action was and is to elect more democrats.
I've already said what they should do and you've already dismissed it. Now you're pretending there is no possible action to take. Its either you can't read or are being willfully ignorant, not to mention how you never addressed my main point. It's apparent how talking to you never resulted in a productive discussion.
You can keep letting Democrats as a whole pretend to care about their voters while excusing every bad thing they ever did and I'll just watch America slide into fascism as voters continue to lose trust in the DNC.
I'm sorry that you think your nothing is better than their nothing.