this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
315 points (98.2% liked)

World News

46368 readers
2760 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/62976508

Just 10 years ago the US was still seen as being progressive and racism was slowly becoming a thing of the past... and not even in 10 years all the major civil rights achievements of rhe past 70 years are being thrown out so fast it is making my head spin.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PM_ME_WRISTS_GIRL@lemmynsfw.com 58 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Just 10 years ago the US was still seen as being progressive

Sorry what, by whom?

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 74 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Relative to our past and relative to many other countries we were doing pretty well. Not perfect but large meaningful improvements.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Being dragged kicking and screaming into making some progress is more how I would have described the political side of that though.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

which still saw america as being the greatest it had ever been in 2015. the united states has been an eternal nightmare, and the fact that the people were forcing it to be better, kicking and screaming, was the tidal shift that saw the parasites clamoring for 45.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My point was more that while parts of the population might have been progressive there were very few political figures on the progressive end of the spectrum and very few political actions.

In fact in 2016 the very slightly more progressive of the two major parties in the US felt so strongly that they needed to stop progressive movements that they nominated an extremely establishment candidate (Hillary Clinton) in an election that was clearly shaping up to be an anti-establishment election despite having a popular anti-establishment progressive candidate dropped in their lap (Bernie Sanders).

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

i hear you and get that's what you're saying. all i'm saying is is that in the history of america, that was the peak of compassion and patience in our system. and as you said, the corporations decided to make us choose between fascism immediately or fascism down the road. 10 years ago was the most progressive we've ever been and it was so far from good enough.

[–] stopdropandprole@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

they probably mean "culturally progressive", as in, woke leaning. bombs with rainbows painted on them.

the US was only very briefly controlled by a progressive govt and it took a great depression and threats of mob violence against the ruling class to get that much.

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 19 points 2 days ago (4 children)

We had a black president dude - twice elected!

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

except that was due to extenuating circumstances, the 08 recession, if that had not happen, obama wouldve never won.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Well don't worry, there is another recession coming...

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Neither Mexico, Netherlands nor Japan have ever had a black president.

The reason is clear. The USA is better. We have all sorts of religions and cultures living together in neighborhoods. Sometimes like in Texas, those neighborhoods are silos and people do tend to stick to their own background. But 2nd gen usually intermingles and becomes part of the melting pot. Its a thing. Hopefully it never stops being a thing.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

...you do know the reason that the US has a large black population right?

I'm Canadian and not shading on diversity at all but just because we have a lot of different cultures mixing together doesn't make anyone 'better'. There are reasons we are as diverse as we are, and most of those reasons are historically very, very bad.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why would countries with a much, much smaller black population percentage than the US have a black president? Not to mention that the Netherlands and Japan have a prime minister as the head of government, not a president.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Okay.... Let's have a fun contest! Who can tell me why we have black, Hispanic, Asian and such people in the US, but other countries only have whoever lived there. Do mention slavery, railroads, trade routes and poverty. Go! I'll give you 5 minutes!

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

10 years ago I was a teenager to be completely fair