454
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Alabama is seeking to become the first state to execute a prisoner by making him breathe pure nitrogen.

The Alabama attorney general’s office on Friday asked the state Supreme Court to set an execution date for death row inmate Kenneth Eugene Smith, 58. The court filing indicated Alabama plans to put him to death by nitrogen hypoxia, an execution method that is authorized in three states but has never been used.

Nitrogen hypoxia is caused by forcing the inmate to breathe only nitrogen, depriving them of oxygen and causing them to die. Nitrogen makes up 78% of the air inhaled by humans and is harmless when inhaled with oxygen. While proponents of the new method have theorized it would be painless, opponents have likened it to human experimentation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bemenaker@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nitrogen is pretty cheap, and would be considered way more human. Bullets aren't an instant death, the cattle thing would be but considered brutal. Both a firing squad and cattle thing would be considered cruel and unusual punishment, the SCOTUS has already said firing squads are cruel and unusual. The classic three drug cocktail was painless but no one will.make it.

Nitrogen makes you feel.like.your drunk, nitrogen narcosis, until you pass out. It is considered painless.

But the real question you should be asking is, why do we even still allow the death penalty. Innocent people have been put to death. Or at least enough doubt that they shouldn't have been killed.

[-] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

But revenge is more important then justice. /s

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago

People always think of the innocent person who got off. I get that. But what do you do with somebody who has, say, shot lots of kids in a school?

Rehab? In what world could we let that person back into society?

[-] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Never said let them back into society. Knowing you will die in a 6x6 cell, alone, and unwanted by anyone in the whole world is far worse punishment then anything else I can imagine. But killing anyone, regardless of crime, or evidence, makes you just as much of a murderer as anyone convicted of that crime. Also, there is the possibility of killing someone completely innocent, what then? Oops our bad, but we killed 30 other bad people, so this one isn't a big deal?

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Many people would prefer to be executed vs. being tortured for 50 years in a cell. Others wouldn't, though. Is it worse to imprison someone innocent for decades or mistakenly execute them? I'm not sure. People could take their choice, perhaps? That's pretty cruel too though.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Knowing you will die in a 6x6 cell, alone, and unwanted by anyone in the whole world is far worse

So... Revenge then?

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Is there some reason a prison is incapable of containing them until they die? The only two choices aren’t kill them or let them rejoin society.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I didn't mean to imply that - but I don't see how lifetime imprisonment is any more humane. In fact others arguing against the death penalty are saying it's worse which... Is confusing.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

because a huge percentage of convicted are later exonerated, and a large percentage that aren't are posthumously exonerated.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I'm talking about where there is zero doubt the crime was committed.

School shootings and the like.

[-] bemenaker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You can't have it both ways. I only execute the absolutely guilty and never put someone in jail who is innocent. The world is not black and white. It's not as simple as you make it out. Innocent people who ere put to death by the criminal.justoce system, at the time we're beyond a doubt guilty.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I'm posting a hypothetical.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Every prosecution team will tell you there is zero doubt until the exoneration, at which point they'll say "hmm."

Also, you say "zero doubt in school shootings" but unlike folk-wisdom, the law actually does care about the minutae of culpability and is exactly the place to get into the distinctions between aforethought, meditation and whether or not they were responsible for their actions.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

We can know they did it regardless of culpability.

Let's hypothesize a perfect legal system for sake of argument.

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If it were your kid in that chair, you wouldn't give a shit what they'd done, you'd fight with your last breath to save them anyway.

Who you are doesn't matter.

Who they are doesn't matter.

Fight to save them.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

If it were my 12 year old they killed I would be taking a different view...

[-] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bullets aren't an instant death, the cattle thing would be but considered brutal.

Bullets and the cattle thing are both instant when they are fired at the right part of the brain. Why is more brutal and less humane? If it kills them immediately, then it’s as humane as killing someone gets.

[-] bemenaker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Firing squads didn't shoot you in the head.

[-] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I didn’t say they should use a firing squad. I said they could shoot you in the part of the brain with a bullet that will kill you instantly.

[-] bemenaker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And it is illegal per cruel and unusual punishment clause.of the Constitution

[-] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Why is it cruel and unusual to kill someone instantly with a bullet and not cruel and unusual to electrocute or hang someone?

It’s not actually written in the constitution that killing someone instantly with a bullet is a cruel and unusual punishment. It’s an interpretation of the constitution that is frankly bizarre considering the ways we do actually execute people.

[-] its_pizza@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

The 3 drug cocktail worked, but it was often a minimally-trained technician charged with placing the actual IV lines. I know most of us have had an IV sometime in our life with relatively little pain, but that seems not to be the case for some inmates. Anxiety, old age, obesity, dehydration, and myriad other reasons can make it more challenging to place a catheter.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Bullets are as instant death as it gets. For a couple bucks you can headshot someone with a 50 cal, you can vaporize the brain way before neurons can propagate... Literally impossible to feel pain physically

Humane isn't about the victim though, it's about the observers. Nitrogen is painless and it's not until the last moments the victim even notices, but in those last months there might be panic

If you disagree with my point, ask yourself... Heroin or fentanyl OD is probably about the cheapest and most pleasant death, why has it never even been considered?

[-] bemenaker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think fentanyl is a great solution, if you're going to allow the death penalty, which I'm against. And it's more than just a bullet. Read the SCOTUS decision that banned firing squads. The cruel and inhuman part isn't even the pain felt, it's the terror inflicted waiting for it to happen. Psychologically it is far worse waiting for a gun shot than an injection that will put you to sleep and numb you. Mentally there is a huge difference. It is psychological terror, and therefore cruel and inhuman punishment.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago

I would rather be shot than nitrogen then because I want to die sober.

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
454 points (98.3% liked)

News

23259 readers
3237 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS