this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
1363 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

7583 readers
4205 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

If you need to wait 18 years to vote you shouldn't be able to vote once you are 18 years from average life expectancy (as in life expectancy is 80, you can vote until you're 62, not after).

Imagine how much focus would be put on healthcare if that were the case...

[–] isles@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Dumb and arbitrary, just how we like it!

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

If it works one way it should work the other way as well! You're too young to be responsible enough to vote? Then you can be too old to care enough about the future to vote!

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world -5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

A quick google says the US is 77 years, add 18 to that and you’re already way too high. 77 is geriatric, just like everyone complained about the last and current US presidents.

Or… did you mean ‘from’ as in below? That would make more sense. Early 60s isn’t too old though.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 22 hours ago

Yes, I meant 18 years after birth = 18 years before average age of death, so politicians would need to either reduce 18 to something lower or would have to work to increase life expectancy.