this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
407 points (97.0% liked)

memes

15012 readers
3684 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I downvote spelling problems immediately. I bet there's a high correlation between fallacies and "can't spell for shit".

[–] last_philosopher@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This is a type of ad hominem fallacy because you're downvoting based on something about the speaker that is unrelated to the argument. You might argue that there is a correlation between the misspellings and logical fallacies, but you offer no evidence, and the fact that you committed this phallusy while spelling everything correctly speaks otherwise.

it's not about the speaker, it's about the their past actions

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Even if it’s a good point or funny? Sometimes people type fast and their brains jumble stuff

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I often have to edit my comments a couple times before I fix all the issues and it might be a while before I catch it.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One must have a respect for their audience. Proofreading takes one person a few seconds, and collectively saves thousands of people time trying to decipher.

[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I think there’s a balance. If it’s indecipherable, sure, too far. But like I said, if it’s obviously a good contribution, meaning it makes sense, I’m not gonna downvote just because the person misspelled something. I also think in this case it’s far from being disrespectful to the audience. Plus English isn’t everybody’s first language.

I had a math professor who misspelled so much stuff. “Existance” and stuff like that. I really didn’t give a fuck though. Found it kinda endearing.

I’m not really on the defensive btw because I do proofread my comments lol

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I am almost 70 and I some of the time these days I wonder is this English evolving or is it just someone who can’t spell etc. It makes my brain hurt. To make it worse for me my mother was a British war bride who would only let me speak “The Queen’s English” and made me watch Jeopardy every lunch for about 8 yrs. Sound great? Nope, my mother never taught me the rules. Even though I sounded very smart and had a great command of the English language I could never correct anyone because they would say why and I could not cite the rules.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Causation (morons can't spell) = Correlation (morons also say stupid shit that is wrong)

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

My views on spelling changed dramatically over time. I am able to spell very well (in French) so I used it for moral superiority.

Then I learned and realized that the French opaque, obtuse spelling system has been openly and admittedly designed for social elitism and discrimination. It's less about intellect and more about education, i.e., privileges and social class. Mastery of a dumb, nonsensical spelling system is no intellectual feat, it's a circus act.

English orthography is also dumb and nonsensical, but I guess this is due to the hybrid nature of the language and the lack of an Academy. But it's also used by elitists for moral superiority, which I find hilarious.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

the French opaque, obtuse spelling system has been openly and admittedly designed for social elitism and discrimination

I find that difficult to believe, would you happen to remember where you read this? I'm curious to know more about that.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sure! Here's a nice article by Mireille Elchacar, lexicologist and professor at TELUQ university.

The relevant portion:

Le 8 mai 1673, l’Académie française tranche en faveur de l’orthographe savante « qui distingue les gens de Lettres d’avec les Ignorants et les simples femmes ».

My translation:

The 8 of May, 1673, the French Academy decides in favor of a scholarly orthography "which distinguishes literary people from the ignorants and simple women".

Yikes! That's the basis of the "etymologic" or rather pseudo-etymologic orthography of French. The French Academy is still the authority for the French language, a remnant of the Ancient Régime. To my knowledge, they haven't retracted this statement since and to my judgement they still adhere to it by their actions and decisions today.