this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
686 points (99.3% liked)

politics

24024 readers
3703 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Both Trump and his "border czar," Tom Homan, have said California officials could face arrest if they're perceived as impeding ICE operations.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom pushed back against threats of arrest by Trump administration officials, remaining defiant as he oversees clashes between law enforcement agents and protesters in response to immigration raids across Los Angeles while also managing an ongoing power struggle with the federal government.

In an interview for MSNBC with NBC News’ Jacob Soboroff, Newsom called Homan's bluff, urging him to "just get it over with" and move ahead with the arrest.

“He’s a tough guy. Why doesn’t he do that? He knows where to find me,” Newsom said. “That kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Hopefully these comments are the ones that will make it clear just how hard the "Democrats bad" narrative is being pushed on Lemmy.

They want us to focus more on the Dems than the people actually implementing fascism. They want to manipulate the next election, and they're starting early. It will get worse.

[–] hzl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's much more effective to fracture a group by pretending to be part of it than by leveling criticism from the outside.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Exactly. And it's going to work despite the few comments we leave here pointing it out.

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

tactic has worked fucking incredibly so far. why stop now.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

It's an iteration on r/thedonald.

Just like there, some of it is genuine. And more of it is genuine because it's easy and fits in with the "consensus".

Luckily the mod/admin powers here aren't being used to assist it, unlike previous times.

[–] KAtieTot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

"Democrats bad narrative"

Idk, the actions of the governor of the state where national guard and potentially military are being mobilized against Americans exercising their first amendment rights, seems kind of relevant to the whole thing.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yes the part where he is opposing that and not the one implementing it is relevant

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 17 hours ago

Good point. The protestors do that and more and they have a fraction of the power Newsom has. It's pathetic.