this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
599 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24024 readers
4916 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Both Trump and his "border czar," Tom Homan, have said California officials could face arrest if they're perceived as impeding ICE operations.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom pushed back against threats of arrest by Trump administration officials, remaining defiant as he oversees clashes between law enforcement agents and protesters in response to immigration raids across Los Angeles while also managing an ongoing power struggle with the federal government.

In an interview for MSNBC with NBC News’ Jacob Soboroff, Newsom called Homan's bluff, urging him to "just get it over with" and move ahead with the arrest.

“He’s a tough guy. Why doesn’t he do that? He knows where to find me,” Newsom said. “That kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let's go."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 5 points 25 minutes ago

One guy who's actively defying this orange turd and all the fucking tankies on here would rather shit on Gavin because he's not the perfect online liberal like they are.

You people are the fucking problem right now.

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 5 points 38 minutes ago

Just more TACO comments from wanna be bullies. These people would lose their teeth in a street fight. Then act like they are Rocky Balboa on state media Fox News. The reality is that they are pussies. Punch a bully and he never bothers you again.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

If I am a betting person, and if Trump doesn't arrest him sooner, I would bet that Newsom will run for president near 2028, and that is when Trump will have him arrested.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Newsome will definitely run for president, and HitlerPig knows it, that's why he's going after him now.

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 3 points 37 minutes ago

Alexei Navalny would advise Newsome to not get arrested easily. Fight these fascists at every turn.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So are you? A betting person?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 0 points 50 minutes ago

In the case of Trump? No. The dude is unpredictable.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 35 points 4 hours ago

Well, shit. There's a lot to not like about Newsom, but I can think of 100 democrat politicians that would have folded like wet Kleenex by now. He could be a lot more aggressive about this, but he's clearly trying to exhaust all the normal channels. Critical support for Gavin.

[–] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 46 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Gavin Newson kept California safe during the peak uncertain times of COVID.

Gavin Newson survived a recall that was initiated by the trump blowhards in Orange County and the Central Valley.

We do NOT NEED 2,000 national guards deployed to L.A. Trump WANTS to make things escalate, and 2,000 troops WILL make things escalate.

Your dipshit dictator is siccing military troops on citizens. This is war against citizens.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

He did some great things during the peak but, since, he's frequently been nothing but a corpo ghoul. Sabotaging efforts to break up convicted killer and "power company"^1^, PG&E. Supporting rate increases so that the board of convicted killer and "power company", PG&E didn't have to face any actual penalties for killing people. Adamantly opposing any wealth tax. Putting significant support behind RTO/quiet layoffs.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 52 minutes ago

I was a supporter for a while, but the more I get to know him, the less I like him. He's just another Corporatist Republican-Lite Democrat, and those are the losers that got HitlerPig elected in the first place. If he becomes President, HitlerPig, or someone worse, will be back in office in 2032.

I want the next Democratic president to be an aggressive, no apology, hard core reformer, who isn't afraid to stand up to Sociopathic Oligarchs and Traitors.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

he's got a law degree, and passed bar, he's aware of what an enormous investment opportunity that level of civil rights violation would entail.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 30 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

"That kind of bloviating is exhausting."

Bloviate - talk at length, especially in an inflated or empty way.

Instantly added to my lexicon. There's another word I've often used when I should have been using this one, because the other word (malapropism) isn't exactly what I am meaning a lot of the time but it was the closest thing to what I was trying to convey (someone talking out of their ass in a way that tries to sound intelligent when it isn't).

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I keep a message chain to myself for new words - here's my most recent:

architectonics, antimonies, deracinated, vituperative, idempotent, moither, uxorious, voussoir, integumented, exuviated, entelechy.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 4 hours ago

moither

That's the opposite of foither! 😃

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I hate the word so much because Bill O'Reilly used to constantly use it back in his hayday (early 2ks) so I associate it with him.

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I remember that and even as a teenager it drove me nuts because that is exactly what his entire news slot was ...him , bloviating. Fuck that guy

[–] sapetoku@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

...and osculate my posterior!

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 55 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Trump’s "border czar," Tom Homan, warned Saturday that immigration operations and the presence of federal personnel would continue in the city despite criticism from Democratic leaders who've warned it could further escalate protests. He threatened arrest for anyone who obstructs the immigration enforcement effort, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass — though he acknowledged that neither yet had "crossed the line."

Cross the line, Gavin. Cross the line and we’ll believe it’s not an idle threat. Until then you’ll always be Patrick Bateman to me.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The illegal deportations were the fucking line that was crossed. Put those fuckers on the defensive and don't let them abuse language like this.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 3 hours ago

Let's see Stephan Miller's card...

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 68 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

How exactly is Newsome impeding ICE?

They're talking about arresting teachers for protecting their kids. They are not talking about Newsome cuz he's sueing the government. But yeah, go and make this issue about your ego and presidential run bud.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 27 points 6 hours ago

He’s not impeding anything, but Republicans love manufacturing an alternate reality that justifies their violent thugishness.

load more comments
view more: next ›