this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Politics

10506 readers
220 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SteevyT@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I like the way my area does it. Electronic machine, prints an easily human readable ballot that you then review and physically turn in. Only change I'd be tempted to make would be if it printed a copy for you to keep, but I can think of issues with that idea.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah you can’t have a ballot that someone else can force you to keep to prove how you’ve voted… anonymous, individual, untraceable ballots are essential

though perhaps that’s could be mitigated if you could print as many ballots/receipts as you like so you can submit your real one and keep a fake one… then anyone with no care can keep their real one, and anyone being coerced can keep a fake one

i totally agree this is the way to do it: the machines can even keep tallys for early results reporting, but the paper ballots are the only thing that actually matters. that would make subverting the electronic systems useless. it’d also be a good sanity check on the count

[–] SteevyT@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

Well, your hypothetical is more realistic than my hypothetical. I just didn't want my voting record in my home with the way things are currently going just in case. I didn't even think of coercion.