this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
255 points (97.8% liked)
People Twitter
7400 readers
1199 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Actually trying to read a transcript of what he says is like pulling teeth. He's absolutely all over the place and takes half a dozen tangents to get to a one-sentence point
There was an article during his first term written by a French translator who was lamenting how her job was completely impossible - if she translates the general gist of his speech then it's like she's misrepresenting the nonsense, but if she translates it directly then a lot of people think that she's being either incompetent or malicious
This is a famous example but you could have chosen any of his "speeches". I'd claim that the newer ones are even worse.
Journalists around the world have been complaining about this ever since 2016: it's impossible to write good political journalism about Trump. There was a collective sigh of relief in 2020, manifesting itself as pleasant silence. Then Jan 6 happened...
He's probably took a hit of nose powder before typing all of it
Idk I read that passage and I can mostly understand what he's saying, I'd go as far as to say it's just as understandable as a lot of the word salad non answers from typical politicians. This sounds like how someone might present themselves in conversation, someone who isn't trained in how to give speeches or have a high level understanding of language construction. People vote on vibes and the vibes trump is giving up is some guy you might bump into in the pub. That is an exceedingly valuable thing to have as a politician in a society that largely doesn't trust its politicians. And in my opinion they have good reason not to trust them, it's unfortunate who was able to capitalise most on that distrust though.
Right, but there's basically nothing there. He took all that time to say "Iran outnegotiated us". Brevity alone isn't a mark of quality obviously, but the point the person above was making is that underneath the bluster there really is very little substance. You had said you don't know whether it's actually dumb or just not what you're used to hearing, and we're both saying that yes it really is dumb. It can be effective and popular while being dumb as well, unfortunately
Part of being a politician is being appealing. He's not just reciting information.