this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
387 points (96.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

8096 readers
3932 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you need "Zionist corporate" in that post? Any media calling this a "preemptive strike" are pushing a bs narrative.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Because corporate media in the West, especially the US and UK complies with Zionist talking points.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

And? What about non-Zionist non-corporate sources that back the same narrative? Would you see that as any different?

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Non corporate i.e. independent news tends to have clearer perspectives on the genocide and Zionism's malign influence in domestic and international politics

One example is not adopting Zionist talking points and perspectives (e.g. rapes, beheaded babies), without critical analysis or framing October 7th in the context of the Zionist regime's occupation of Palestine. Something Corporate media deliberately obfuscates.

Corporate media uses rhetorical shielding like the use of the passive "Palestinians killed in bombings" to avoid blaming Israel or "Hamas run health ministry" to discredit casualty reports.

Another issue is that they also fail to report what Israelis actually tell their people ("fighting human animals", "babies are targets") and rather rely on carefully scripted official responses in English.

Yet another issue is that they do not mention ICC arrest warrants on Netanyahu and Smotrich, or that Israel is on trial for genocide at the ICJ, or Indeed that western countries are ignoring the genocide convention which obliges them to sanction Israel and instead are actively arming and supporting it.

They omit so much given what's on social media and elsewhere that it has never been more obvious that Western media's role is to act as interlocutor and propagandist for the Empire.