379

Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) is proposing two amendments to an appropriations bill that would defund the various prosecutions of former President Trump.

He is adding to the defense of the former president mounted by Trump allies in the House as they circle the wagons in the face of four indictments.

Clyde, a member of the House Appropriations Committee, on Monday announced plans for two amendments to the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies (CJS) fiscal 2024 appropriations bill that would “prohibit the use of federal funding for the prosecution of any major presidential candidate prior to the upcoming presidential election on November 5th, 2024,” according to a press release.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago

prior to the upcoming presidential election on November 5th, 2024

They're not even subtle.

[-] HWK_290@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

It's so... Disappointing that they're rallying behind this decrepit, puss filled slug.

[-] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

It’s because they are guilty of shit too, and they are afraid of their shit coming to light as well

[-] archonet@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even if this was added to the bill, there's no way it would ever reach the president's desk. And if it did, there's no way Biden wouldn't veto it.

This is just somebody signalling his loyalty to Orange Steal so he can swoop in and grab a little of his powerbase when Orange Steal is serving out his golden years in a jumpsuit that matches his spray tan.

I guarantee you, the Biden administration has a planned timeline they want to see this prosecution play out over, and it ends in a conviction before the election. It has contingencies in place for every bullshit delaying tactic conservatives will try to throw at them. He's going to jail for a very long time, and I'd say the majority of people are starting to wise up to this fact.

[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Doesn't even matter.

Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.)

Republicans have shot his bills down countless times because he's mostly a prick to everyone. Nobody likes the guy and he's hardly useful in any capacity to the GOP outside of a warm body who can physically push a "yea" button when they tell him to push it.

He's like MTG who is from the close by 14th district except more irritating to listen to and less well put together. Pretty much exactly what you'd expect from rural Georgia yet just less pleasant in pretty much every aspect than most Republicans.

Not only that, guy is a well known coward. His usual response to difficult things is to do his best impression of Zoidberging out of the situation. Guy is worthless skin who'd run for cover if someone started popping popcorn.

[-] Icalasari@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Thank fuck, I was worried for a bit that they could actually do something

The New Nazis are not very good at this, are they?

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If they're on that team as it is it's because they're: greedy, stupid, cowards, or all of the above.

The New Nazi slogan is: "Wah, ich bin ein Kleinkind! Wechsle meine Windel, frau!"

And their mascot is: https://cdn.trendhunterstatic.com/phpthumbnails/81/81118/81118_1_600.jpeg?auto=webp

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I wouldn’t have thought the Cheeto Mussolini’s baby photos were in color.

[-] demlet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Let's hope not, or if so let's hope it's very hard to prove... If Biden has all that planned, it would suggest executive interference and politically motivated prosecution. Don't get me wrong, Trump needs to crash and burn, just saying...

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
379 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2586 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS